22 comments

  • Edited Thursday, Oct 30

    how likely is it that we'll get passages like these where so many questions can be answered after reading just one passage?! its crazy how many questions could be answered just on passage A in this first pass of the "split strategy" in the lesson

    4
  • Edited Friday, Oct 24

    E is not wrong (in my opinion) because the passage does draw contrast between other kinds of persuasive writing (advocate contrasted with propagandist) they are both ways of persuading.

    0
  • Monday, Sep 15

    This section is awful... I'm forced to watch the video

    3
  • Saturday, May 31

    so far this method is looking amazing.

    9
  • Monday, May 12

    this split method is literally changing my life bye

    18
  • Monday, Mar 10

    I don't see how E is wrong 😭. It seems to me that all social sciences require persuasive writing...? Also, author doesn't say that historians tend to be propagandists. He just rejects propaganda. Thus, I don't see the "may tend" part. #help

    thank you in advance for responding!

    0
  • Wednesday, Feb 26

    I didn't eliminate A on my first run-through, not sure why now that I am watching this! I'll work on being more aggressive!

    3
  • Tuesday, Jan 14

    It's actually amazing me how many questions you can answer with just one passage

    14
  • Thursday, Dec 05 2024

    I would have skipped this question because I would have a lower confidence overall for the AC I would lean towards. I still need an alternative explanation for D #help

    1
  • Saturday, Aug 10 2024

    #feedback, I really like the combo of Kevin's explanations + typed outline that is used in this video format. It's much easier to read and follow. Thanks! :-)

    5

Confirm action

Are you sure?