I cannot seem to get above a 176 on my blind review. I am grateful that I test at around the same level as my BR (171-175) but I also recognize that I am not going to be able to get above a 175 if I am not doing so on the blind review. I do the wrong answer journals (why did I get this wrong - what was my thinking - why is the correct answer right - why didn't I think it was right - what type of mindset/strategy is necessary for me to get it right next time) and I even log trends in wrong questions. I even have a vocab list I study. I just cannot get past this plateau. Any advice would be helpful
- Joined
- May 2025
- Subscription
- Free
For a question this difficult, the fact the explanation isn't even a minute long is crazy.
For those struggling, this was how I understood this. A scientific principle is not copyright-able because you could express the principle in many ways. It is, in itself, the underlying idea that is being expressed however one may do so.
Ex. Gravity: you can say the word gravity, you could write the equation for it (9.8s^2/m), or you could explain what gravity does. All of those are the expression but gravity is in itself the underlying idea.
Would a necessary assumption count as a "presupposition on which the argument is explicitly based"? Is there a way to get an example of when this would be true.
The evaluative opinion on what is and isn't easy is so discouraging. While I LOVE 7sage, this type of rhetoric has been difficult to handle throughout as it is demoralizing.
#Feedback the written responses do not align with the answer choice. EI. the reasoning for D mentions "New Planet Discovered"
Wouldn't the final sentence actually be the exclusive OR -- it can't be unpopular with both of them so shouldn't it be the biconditional?:
popular with student <-> unpopular with faculty // popular with faculty <-> unpopular with students
So is it that we are supposed to assume that because there's not more aesthetic enjoyment people won't come out? I don't see how B leads to the idea that people don't participate
The UI for the mobile device is fantastic and works so well! I just added the website to my phone home screen and use it like an app.
Doesn't this actually read as his cruel misdeeds caused his political condition? It seems the critic is saying that he was a tyrant BECAUSE he was cruel, which means being cruel was causally linked to him being a tyrant. I don't understand how his "Political condition" of being a tyrant caused his misdeeds rather than the other way around.