- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
@epayne17 Ha! During the second passage I literally caught myself thinking "wait a minute, I've already forgotten about the first passage ... what was it about?" Not helpful, brain. Not helpful.
I really struggled between AC A and AC D, sticking with AC A on a coin flip. After watching JY's explanation video it clicked for me: AC A says the main point is about what Glück argues (in response to critics), and AC D says the main point is about what Glück writes (in opposition to her critics).
#feedback I like it when the text version of the lesson includes the previous paragraphs of the passage so it's easier to go back and reread them.
Thanks, @KevinLin. You think highlighting would be more effective than sketching or listing summaries or key points on a blank piece of paper?
#feedback I agree with BriaPope. The content of the lessons is terrific and the principles seem sound, but I'd love specific guidance about how to physically keep track of my low-rez summaries and whatnot. Writing on paper is not an option. If you suggest we keep it in our heads, maybe say so.
@AudreyGilmour I struggled with this, too. I think you were right to highlight the word "either," which I think does imply exclusive or: "either A or B, but not both." In an exclusive or situation A -> /B.
With this in mind I think answer candidate A would be a fine choice if answer candidate E was not also an option.
I think A is logically very similar to the reasoning in the stimulus (and I think it's sound reasoning with an exclusive or), but it is certainly not MOST similar when compared to E.
I feel like when doing a shallow dip on B I need to consider the presence of the word "few" in the conclusion a match for the word "most" in the conclusion of the stimulus, because few presumably implies /most.
@SophiaWood I'd say it's definition 6 here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/advance "to bring forward for notice, consideration, or acceptance : propose"