bro wat

it's great for logic. the lsat is about 'lawgic'. i'll keep asking it for insight, but it obviously won't change what the lsac says is right. duuuhhhh

who said i am. i wanted to see what they would say about the problem.

both xAI and ChatGPT agree that the answer should be A, not B. I'm just getting trolled at this point

I ran this through xAI and ChatGPT, and they both said multiple answers (A, B, and E) satisfy the conditions. I haven't had them agree with the LSAC yet.

bro i don't think this is about logic

I thought somewhere in these lessons that doing that wasn't enough for strengthening or weakening, because it didn't move the needle of support in any direction. I must be wrong :(

I agree. Making you assume that starting with less means that your returns will not be large is nonsense. They're using 'large returns' far too casually to expect you to know what they mean by that.