Subscription pricing
Currently my only high priority LR question type is Conditional Reasoning, and Causal Reasoning is one of my only medium priority.
Are the only lessons on these question types the foundational ones?
PT Questions
Xexne198
- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Xexne198
Wednesday, Dec 10
#feedback more inconsistency on lesson structure during the passage. Lessons 1 and 3 are similar while 2 and 4 are similar but the two styles have stark differences. Please adjust
Xexne198
Wednesday, Dec 10
#feedback the organization of the lessons on this passage are super inconsistent. 1st and 3rd lessons don't present the paragraph to read before breaking it down while the 2nd lesson does, and the first sentence of the paragraph we are given is not italicized or bold while the rest of the paragraph is. Please fix this for future users
Xexne198
Tuesday, Dec 09
I agree. For this reason I’ve ended up just searching the section explanation and going through afterwards to see, so essentially doing this without it being a feature
Xexne198
Sunday, Dec 07
How does this only support the first perspective? The second perspective that believes in a continuous bombardment also mentions the entire inner system?
Xexne198
Friday, Nov 07
I hate this passage. Never seen the word "austere" before and it feels like the entire passage hinges on your understanding of that. There are no branches to help you understand it and you could interpret 1000 different ways in each sentence.
Xexne198
Sunday, Nov 02
I chose A when timed, but D on blind review.
I think it is clear that the author of A doesn't believe there is a conflict between science and the paranormal, he said they compliment each other!
I get that A is also correct, but D is not incorrect
Xexne198
Sunday, Nov 02
The wording of how polyacrylates reduces water pollution threw me off, and I had no recollection of the water part of the groundwater instance. BAHHHH
Xexne198
Edited Thursday, Nov 06
This might be the worst question I've seen across 26 PTs and 2500 drill questions taken.
You need to make more assumptions for the correct answer than you would for most of the wrong ACs lmao fuck this
Xexne198
Saturday, Oct 25
The explanation for B doesn't really work. JY says if its successful its "bad" but who cares, how could that not also apply to the mayor adopting the rival proposal?
Xexne198
Saturday, Oct 25
I got this correct, but I spent more time debating AC E than any other, sucks to see JY only spent 3 seconds on that AC
Xexne198
Monday, Oct 20
B threw me off.
The 'fish meal' was essentially the only thing I remembered from the start of that paragraph and the comparison to wild fish made it seem to my brain like it was the exact same thing, so I just saw this immediately and moved on.
Xexne198
Sunday, Oct 12
While AC B might be the best weakener, it is still so shit.
It requires that you assume that the tomb of the person it belonged to had people to pass it on to, and even then for it to weaken it requires the assumption that this continued forever.
If an object that is normally passed on from generation to generation, IN THE STONE AGE, what if this was the last person to die in the Stone Age? Then it would be buried with them.
Shit logic.
Xexne198
Monday, Sep 29
My issue was I read it as "each individual hunter kills no fewer deer today" (ex. In 1960 each individual deer hunter would kill 50 deer, the same or more if true today), but C) saying there is less hunters could explain the discrepancy.
1000 hunters kill 50 deer in 1960 = 50,000 deer dead
400 hunters kill 50 deer in 2025 = 20,000 deer dead
This is possibly the cruellest question I have encountered on the entire LSAT. A difficult section, and a difficult passage topped off with a long and gruelling parallel structure. Just evil stuff.