Self-study
Currently my only high priority LR question type is Conditional Reasoning, and Causal Reasoning is one of my only medium priority.
Are the only lessons on these question types the foundational ones?
Xexne198
- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 169
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2026
Discussions
Xexne198
Edited Monday, Jan 05
"Avertising techniques are unable to induce unwilling behavior in rational, informed adults" supports AC E, don't love how JY just brushes this aside and calls it terrible at all
Xexne198
Saturday, Dec 20 2025
@PrayForMe-1 it would be right if it said "some" but not "most". We are only told that hit writers are often asked, not that most or all are.
Xexne198
Saturday, Dec 13 2025
This is possibly the cruellest question I have encountered on the entire LSAT. A difficult section, and a difficult passage topped off with a long and gruelling parallel structure. Just evil stuff.
Xexne198
Thursday, Dec 11 2025
@abu1732baker Southward would mean it is moving south IE came from the north. Nothing north of it would mean it is impossible for something moving to the south to bring it to that location
Xexne198
Wednesday, Dec 10 2025
#feedback more inconsistency on lesson structure during the passage. Lessons 1 and 3 are similar while 2 and 4 are similar but the two styles have stark differences. Please adjust
Xexne198
Wednesday, Dec 10 2025
#feedback the organization of the lessons on this passage are super inconsistent. 1st and 3rd lessons don't present the paragraph to read before breaking it down while the 2nd lesson does, and the first sentence of the paragraph we are given is not italicized or bold while the rest of the paragraph is. Please fix this for future users
Xexne198
Tuesday, Dec 09 2025
I agree. For this reason I’ve ended up just searching the section explanation and going through afterwards to see, so essentially doing this without it being a feature
Xexne198
Sunday, Dec 07 2025
How does this only support the first perspective? The second perspective that believes in a continuous bombardment also mentions the entire inner system?
Xexne198
Monday, Nov 17 2025
@jenniferlim4063653 2 years later and I am stuck with the same question and no answer :(
Xexne198
Friday, Nov 07 2025
I hate this passage. Never seen the word "austere" before and it feels like the entire passage hinges on your understanding of that. There are no branches to help you understand it and you could interpret 1000 different ways in each sentence.
Xexne198
Sunday, Nov 02 2025
I chose A when timed, but D on blind review.
I think it is clear that the author of A doesn't believe there is a conflict between science and the paranormal, he said they compliment each other!
I get that A is also correct, but D is not incorrect
Xexne198
Sunday, Nov 02 2025
The wording of how polyacrylates reduces water pollution threw me off, and I had no recollection of the water part of the groundwater instance. BAHHHH
Xexne198
Edited Thursday, Nov 06 2025
This might be the worst question I've seen across 26 PTs and 2500 drill questions taken.
You need to make more assumptions for the correct answer than you would for most of the wrong ACs lmao fuck this
Xexne198
Saturday, Oct 25 2025
The explanation for B doesn't really work. JY says if its successful its "bad" but who cares, how could that not also apply to the mayor adopting the rival proposal?
Xexne198
Saturday, Oct 25 2025
@somanglee239718 "The error here is drawing what will happen in the future from what happened in the past." How does the first sentence of AC B not do that exact thing?
Xexne198
Saturday, Oct 25 2025
I got this correct, but I spent more time debating AC E than any other, sucks to see JY only spent 3 seconds on that AC
Xexne198
Monday, Oct 20 2025
B threw me off.
The 'fish meal' was essentially the only thing I remembered from the start of that paragraph and the comparison to wild fish made it seem to my brain like it was the exact same thing, so I just saw this immediately and moved on.
Xexne198
Monday, Oct 20 2025
@KMK This assumption is required because without this assumption the conclusion falls apart.
Conc: Blue Irises is not part of the city's art movement
The support for this is that it doesn't have contrast, which is a feature of almost all the paintings. But we're told that there are other paintings within the movement (abstract ones) that also don't have contrast. So the only way this conclusion could be true is if Blue Irises is NOT an abstract painting, as it still has all the required features to be apart of the art movement if it is.
This is a tough one. I understand AC A is absolutely correct and directly supported.
But AC D can be reasonably inferred quite easily based on the language in paragraph 4 ("international law is a legitimate and important influence on the development of the common law" which can read as other nations laws is an important influence on our Australian common law). AC A is the most correct, but fair to say that AC D is pretty correct too.