@jsmejia321411 how.

Need a better understanding why A is wrong. A and B seem interchangeable.

Is there like particular process for these types of questions so you do not drain your time going back to the passage.

Why is this not an intermediate conclusion? I dont see how the second sentence is not giving it support.

@leos67628 This is how I saw it too, I guess it gives support to the following premises so it is considered a premise?

@elbicho thanks brother, looking at this question without thinking about using lawgic makes it easy.

0% chance this is getting answered on a timed exam with diagramming.

Would you map this out with lawgic on a real exam?

How do we know when we should or should not diagram conditionals? Some questions do not have explicit conditional indicators but we diagram anyway so how do we determine if this a question should or should not be diagrammed.

@DanielNahum just as effectively is the only thing I also see to make it wrong.

Someone clarify for me. C says "sometimes" and based on the small subset of the study that we know from the stimulus this principle occurs "ALL" the time. How could this answer be correct in this case? Or is this just an example choosing the best answer choice available even though it is not perfect? Or is since it is only one study it is not representative of this always happening?

Universal. I see now.

"ALL" of the worlds cultures? really? That seems a little bit unrealistic that this supports a claim for "ALL" of the worlds cultures...

@TomBrady69 Yup I am starting to get confused when it is warranted to negate something.