Discussions

Realistically what is the best way to review wrong answers in RC? In RC you simply got it wrong cause you did not comprehend a certain sentence well enough. Considering this, I find it difficult to know how to actually review this so that you can comprehend better in the future since it will be an entirely different passage.

3

1 comments

  • User Avatar
    Stas1973
    Monday, May 4

    I have been using a two-part process to review RC. I would love to hear what others have been doing RC.

    First, right after I complete the passage I review (while it's still fresh in my brain) what I missed specifically. I write a brief note like "X was Author A's POV, not Author B's."

    Second, I write-up a more general description about what was faulty about my process. Example: I prioritized factual accuracy over bandwidth of a MP answer choice. My rule of thumb is that this description is general to the point that I don't need to know what passage my note refers to. All of these write-ups I store in an RC-style WAG.

    All the best and looking forward to hearing what others have been doing.

    2
You've reached the end of the comments.

Confirm action

Are you sure?