I'm confusing the process of finding the correct answer choice with the method of SA with PSA. I keep choosing a principle/rule that's more generalized and broad, rather than something that's narrow and specific to the argument.

I first chose A, until I read D, then figured because it isn't a PSA question type, A isn't right because it presents a principle type of answer, where as D presents a premise.

So when we choose answer choices for SA, during my blind review I treated the question as a PSA and chose A, (what I initially thought the answer was), should I just keep doing that? Or how do I know that if I'm looking for an answer choice that's kind of a principle (generalized) vs if I should look for an answer that's more specific to the stimulus like D.

bc there is the unless indicator, should we not do

J->F->T->D

conclusion: J->D

~D-> J?

did i get that right? because it's the lesson from group 3 indicators right?