I would strike this question out on 3 pitches. Kick up coffeehouses and restaurants into the domain of public places. it feels like its drowning. /C → /WD, contra WD → C of course answer choices A and E chase it. Ladybird sucked [redacted] yourself. And Bang C → SI, therefore WD → C → SI, answer choice D is correct. Youre out. You were was always out. Youve been out since the day you were born

man i remember seeing this question on a PT i took a few months ago and losing my mind. somehow it feels cathartic to break it down like this

fell for the oldest trick in the book gg

i just know a main conclusion question hates to see my 5/5 ass coming

For the last bit, where the events in the necessary condition branch off, what does that imply about the temporality of the condition? Like, when M is adopted, that guarantees that N and O will be adopted. The branching path seems to say that when M is adopted, either N or O is adopted. Going down one path would seem to preclude the other. Rather the explanation here seems to say that both of those events can happen simultaneously. Is that true?

under the learn section theres a study schedule you can play around with to see what they recommend, you can play with the number of hours you want to study a week and stuff like that