I was wondering what have people done to improve their scores on the reading comprehension section. Ive heard the more sections you go through the more patterns one will learn. Has anything noticed some patterns in this section that seem to be reoccurring? I am still avg. -10 on this section and can't seem to improve my score. I am just not a fast enough reader and once i get to the last passage i feel like i am rushing to complete the questions. Please Help! :(
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I didn't like D since it stated "many times deeper", i didn't think that meant more areas.
so for B to be correct, we would have to know who the opponents were?
@kingse414 My BR is avg -5. What is your strategy and what's worked for you?
Speaking from experience, there's literally no point in doing PT's if you're only halfway through the CC, you don't have a strong understanding of the key concepts that are tested on the LSAT.
For #8, the question states the 1943 edition, so how were we supposed to know in his later years the revisions were representative of this date? #help
Scientific issues being compared to social issues.
Social issues have important political implications and that's why providing equal time make sense.
Then it's stated as the conclusion, if there's scientific issues then there shouldn't be an obligation for providing equal time.
Argument is assuming scientific issues can't have political implications. We want to expose this assumption and deny/disagree with it, meaning they can have political implications.
A. [wrong; this supports the argument because it agrees with the assumption]
B/C/E: [wrong; irrelevant]
D. [correct; this calls out the assumption and disagrees with it, scientific issues HAVE political implications]
Yup, the wording of D was hard to comprehend under timed conditions. Sigh.
I didn't choose D because i thought it attacks the premise...can someone please clarify?
#help (Added by Admin)
T: the linkage between oceans and human eccentricity is due to the practice of using ships as asylums
S: oceans have ALWAYS been viewed eccentricity (invariably associated mysterious + unpredictable)
Thus, they disagree over when/time
I thought D was right because the manager states that copper must be reheated after it's cooled, and it cost more to run, so this could mean the process isn't fuel-efficient but i guess that's an assumption i was making to link the two. Oh well. B does make more sense now.
This questions proves LSAT writers are pieces of shits and how much harder the test has become from the earlier days, smh!