@ With both LR and RC, I've been primarily studying them through PTs. I might do specific sections once in a while, but I don't have a set schedule or strategy. I wanted to get LG out of the way since it's the easiest to improve on. (I studied last summer albeit lazily, whereas this summer, I am doing much more thorough BR and I picked up studying in the beginning of May)

I would just like to add that my BR is usually 175/6, for some reference in answering my questions and addressing my concerns!

168 on my first attempt! That's pretty much how I was PTing for weeks leading up to the test. I even slacked off and slowed down (even took 4 section PTs instead of 5, as I normally did earlier on) so I'm glad I was able to focus and churn a predictable score despite how nervous I was. :) And got 21/23 (with 1 wrong on the virus game) on LG so woot. Those videos certainly helped.

Thank you so much 7sage! What a wonderful community you have provided for me, for many others, and for all those who will need LSAT prep guidance in the future.

@ Thank you! So just to confirm, you don't think I'm being unrealistic, right?

@ Thank you! I appreciate the detailed and honest answer. I agree that the answer choices are slightly more deceptive, which, on the bright side, demonstrates my blind spots and any assumptions and bad habits I have formed during my studies. What would you consider really effective/disciplined study, however? Is this based on a rough number of hours per day (such as 6-8 hours? I can't do that while working but I'm aiming for all day on weekends and 3-4 hours on weekdays). Just want to clarify if disciplined study can be quantified meaningfully at all or if it is highly dependent on my retention and the quality of my drilling and BR. Thanks again!

I'd like to join, please! :)

Will be there!

Personally, I'll sometimes try right away but it doesn't always have the most fruitful sub-game boards with lots of inferences. Other times, I'll keep it in mind and try to connect the rule with other ones that, in conjunction, allow for new and implicit rules/inferences. I feel like if you try splitting every time you encounter one of those rules, you'll get a feel for when it will yield anything or if it's better to hold onto for the time being. That's just based on my experience, though.

Completely agree with @. TGW is miles ahead of Suits, no question. Really interesting discussions about technology and such amusing snapshots of other court systems.

@ Thank you for clarifying!

This is probably a silly question, but will this be recorded and uploaded for future reference or do we have to attend in order to hear the presentation and Q&A?

Hi, I don't know if this has been answered previously, but on the calendar, it states that the BR sessions are 3 hours long. Are they usually 3 hours or is it entirely dependent on how many questions are being discussed and the length of such discussions? Just trying to see how it'll fit in my schedule. Thanks!

Thanks everyone! I'll try some of these suggestions out. Much appreciated.