- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Core
i live and breathe this test because my GPA is terrible. i get nightmares about confusing necessary and sufficient conditions.
Admissions profile
Discussions
So. I failed out of college in 2022. Long story. I'm graduating in Spring from a different college and I'm applying to law school for 2027 with a 2.3 UGPA (my LSAT is 180)
Has anyone here gotten into law school (or known someone who has) who has failed out of college at one point?
Wait, what's that about WashU? I never heard of being able to redact your GPA.
Hi Lia!! Congrats to you on your 180 as well. I asked one of my professors for a LOR too, and he said because I take online classes it's harder for him and he will only be able to speak to my performance, but that's really all I need from him so that works out.
Splitters are common but not to this degree. I can't seem to find any data on applicants like me (but also LSD's site is very broken)
So. I started out at a small local college. Did a few semesters there and transferred to University. Got really sick and medically withdrew. Went back to the small local college and got my associates. Went back to the University and failed out. Went back to the small local college and got my act (somewhat) together and now I'll be graduating in spring.
How in the hell do I approach this? There isn't much data on super splitters to this degree.
I think I have good softs. I worked in the legal field on and off for 5 years while in school and this summer I volunteered for an immigration law nonprofit.
Have 3 attorneys willing to write a LOR for me.
I want to get into University of Florida.
Help.
Edit: just did the calculation and my GPA is around 2.3. also, I am transgender and not sure whether to include that on applications.
Everyone talking about AC C, but why is D not correct? The proposition in the third paragraph presumably applies to all migration movements even though it focuses on just the one
i spent five minutes on this question because i didn't think it was "presupposes"
@ctchoi97548 this is a case of "most strongly supports" not being "strongly supports"
This is a case of "most strongly supported" not meaning "strongly supported"
The passage does state that traveling in airplanes is "typically thought to be voluntary" but it does not specify "by laypeople"?
I think this is more so what the author says should be true, not what is true.
I am not opposed to WashU if I can figure out how to pay for it.