@cmanzano415255 i think governing can be substituted for like controlling, the NGF certainly controlls certain parts of the development of the nervous system. it doesn't have to be the sole authority over the nervous system.

I suppose the date doesn't matter as drastic increase doesn't insinuate that the amount of deer necessarily increased each year so could have maintained or decreased and then shot up causing a "dramatic" increase

@jmuraca011793 reminded me of the "my wifes father-in-law" gave me this company

C is just right because Fermat could have been lying or mistaken and gotten the theorem right somehow.

@zaq3584 yeah she listened to "negative reports" there could have been 99% positive reports on John, thats not a complete and accurate job

@cxmccarthy reading it as cannot easier

B seems just as unsubstantiated as the other claims to me, why does she "need" to think its beneficial. She can totally think that the research described in B is impossible and a waste of money or she can not care that natural resources are being damaged and there are less forests and wildlife. We have no idea what any of her opinions are. D seems way more supported by Hampton than B is by Kim cause he at least says that improvements in agriculture will allow more food to grow without a lot more land devouted to agriculture, which might necessitate eroding wildlife and forests

C is wrong I think because Bentham's principle never became law and we don't know anything about any other current laws.