Study Partners/Accountability - Virtual study room
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Given the description the way the insurance policy was written, I reasonably believe that it was written by (an) LSAT RC writer(s).
1. Isn't this question more of a Necessary Assumption question rather than Strengthen?
2. fraud is bad for progress, it's common sense instead of an assumption. it's like someone says "I use an umbrella to keep the rain away from my hair, therefore the umbrella kept my hair from getting wet", do you need to "assume" the rain is wet? it's common sense that the rain is wet, it cannot be dry. How can frauds be conducive to progress?
Still active~~
For #17 I was looking for something that mentions "fear of wilderness," and missed the "urban dwellers" part. JY:"D is talking about modern people in the NYC... da hell is that to do with this" LOL -- it literally made me laughed out loud. I have a condition that's preventing me from approving my score -- I'm blind lol
This is the BEST explanation for THIS LR problem ever!
This diagram reminds me of another "spectrum", it's about the support of argument, in which it goes from the left to the right (and up) with Terrible argument, Bad argument, Good argument, and finally at the top, Perfect argument.
I think these two "spectrums" will work better together if we put "Anti-support" on the left and "Support" on the right end.
It also would feel more reasonable if the "support" goes stronger along the line to the right, as if ... the middle ground is zero, and to the right it's getting more positive and to the left it's getting more negative (anti-support). Just a thought #feedback
I get the reasoning behind AC C, but negating AC B does destroy the argument: if the quality of the new environment is so bad (great effect) that all of the fish died after being released. So it makes boldness / timidness irrelevant.
What happened to "do not attach the premises"? Isn't AC A attacking the premise that "no active volcanoes have been identified on Venus"?
#help Added by Admin
Reading this in 2023 when AI scored 163 in LSAT and passed the bar exam 90th percentile be like: when I graduate law school 4 years later, will there even be jobs available for human lawyers at all? lol
I was thinking what does Biba's "next-door neighborhood" have anything to do with the pool. So it's Biba's "neighbor"... -_- took me a while to figure this out
I don't think Paragraph 2, 3, and 4 are "other reasons" of African American historians taking a transnational perspective. They are more like the explanation of "certain aspects of the history of African Americans in the US were to be treated honestly."
What are the aspects that needed to be treated honestly?
(a). Para. 2: Citizenship (unique to African Americans)
(b). Para. 3 and 4: Nationalism: the way most early black historian engaged in a sort of nationalism (tho they were against the sort that Para. 3 described)
JY's example of hammer & petting a cat is not analogous to this question, hammer is the wrong tool for the purpose. While in the stimulus this APP is the correct tool to do presentations, as it is a "popular presentation-graphics" tool. The flaw is "(correct) tool can be responsible if it sucks at doing its job", not "using the wrong tool can be responsible for the bad presentation"