Hi, I was wondering if there was a way to pause your problem sets when you're practicing and return to the same question that you left off with when you come back. I was thinking this would be good because I created really long problem sets and when I try to do them on the new digital format I have to do it all in one sitting. I would really like to get a feel for the digital LSAT but still have the option to pause and pick it up again where I left off at a later time. Thanks!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Which sentence are you doing? Because there's only two. It depends on the other logical indicators in the sentence. For example, this stimulus has a lot of no logical indicators so it's usually better to use those when there's nothing else and apply the negate necessary technique. However, if there's something like " if you drink too much you are drunk" then it's in the necessary. I think in general it's better to not use the are as a indicator and try relying on the other indicators because it can be both in the necessary or sufficient depending on the sentence. For example, " if you are hungry then you eat" now it's in this sufficient.
Answer Choice C is easily eliminated because it uses the "or" Construction in the sufficient and necessary, which the stimulus does not use. So you have half of your logic correct but you also need to add antlers to the sufficient and Claws and fangs to the necessary. It should look like this ( keeping in mind that the or Arrow splits in the sufficient and does not split in the necessary)
H→IS
A→IS
H→/C or /F→P
A→/C or /F→P
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
IS→/P
The way I like to think about it is if the stimulus does not have an "or" and an answer Choice does, then you can quickly eliminated because it does not match the same logical structure. Hope that helps 😀
#help
I don't see how B is actually a weakening answer choice because if faddish areas are not lacking in significance then that means scientists will go for them because they're not insignificant which strengthens the argument
I hate this question because it asks you to assume A LOT! J was talking about Unique pieces of art with historicalor aesthetic value AC A is talking about a portrait of someone's father. In order to have J disagree about destroying it You have to assume that that portrait has historical or aesthetic value (Which the AC does not provide) because it is just someone's father without either of those 2 qualities then you should be able to destroy it according to J's argument. Can someone explain this to me please?
@lexxx74569 said:
I dont think you can pause, Ive tried looking all over haha
That's too bad I really wish they would Implement that