Self-study
How would y'all translate this into "lawgic":
"He's nothing if not lazy" ??
PT Questions
anekatell337
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
anekatell337
Monday, Sep 07 2020
Because the conclusion is about the proportion of books that were approved
anekatell337
Monday, Aug 24 2020
Got it thanks guys! I didn't see this on an actual LSAT no worries; I'm just not a native English speaker and had no idea what this meant (worried I might see it on the LSAT and not know what to do with it)
Outside of JY's reason for eliminating E, you can also just recognize that any support it gives to the argument is done by adding an independent premise to strengthen the conclusion. This is not what the question stems asks us to do. We need to strengthen the "grounds" on which the argument is based - the archaeologist's premise/conclusion bond.