User Avatar
angantous
Joined
Dec 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT140.S1.Q22
User Avatar
angantous
Monday, Apr 6

@LSACfunder Thats still not negated properly. The negation of 'any' is 'some are not'.

1
PrepTests ·
PT139.S4.Q19
User Avatar
angantous
Monday, Mar 30

If anyone else understands why (E) is right, but still confused by why (D) is wrong, I found the explanations in the comments and the written explanation pertaining to payouts to be unnecessarily confusing.

It is much easier to eliminate (D) based on the fact that there are many prizes in lotteries, ranging from a few cents to the 'grand' prize. This means that (D) only concerns a subset of the possible lottery prizes. Therefore, (D) only concerns the probability of winning 1 prize, but not the probability of winning any prize.

(D) does not weaken the professor's argument because it could still be equally wise to use resources on lottery tickets or on insurance policies if (D) were true. The probability of winning any prize and the probability of collecting a settlement could be equal.

2
User Avatar
angantous
Friday, Mar 13

@StevanBlauert Thanks so much!

1
PrepTests ·
PT128.S4.P2.Q10
User Avatar
angantous
Thursday, Mar 12

@shanumanu seconded! This explanation video did not provide any tips on how to get this right, just that it was uncharacteristic of this question type. Would love some more insight! @Kevin_Lin

2
User Avatar
angantous
Thursday, Mar 12

@StevanBlauert Thank you for the quick reply and clarification! I also wondered what your thoughts are on when to start taking full length PTs?

I have been studying since December for the June LSAT (I live in the UK so I only have a couple international test dates per year available to me and will hopefully only take it once). I did the course curriculum until February and started drilling the last few weeks.

I have done some timed sections but mostly untimed for the moment. I work full-time so I only have around 15 hours/week to study. I have heard a lot of conflicting advice about whether to do 1 PT/week or start with untimed drills, then move to timed, then move to PTs.

I only have a couple more months of part-time studying left, so the stress is real! Hard to tell if I am making any progress without doing a full length PT, but I do not feel ready for timed conditions at all.

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

1
User Avatar
angantous
Wednesday, Mar 11

Hi ! Thank you for these tips! I wanted to clarify one of your points:

If you are just beginning do not read the question stem first, read the stimulus first. If you have been studying for a long time then it may be hard to switch from question stem to stimulus.

If you are not just beginning studying and have gotten into the habit of reading the stem first, are you recommending reading the stimulus first?

1
User Avatar
angantous
Edited Wednesday, Feb 18

@Kevin_Lin Thank you for your quick response and your suggestions. I will follow your recommendations.

I would have about 13 weeks of practice if I was able to complete each Practice Block in a week. If the blocks take me 1.5 weeks on average (or I leave out activities to complete them in 1 week) I would be completing 6.5 less practice blocks (13x1.5=19.5). This is significantly less studying (1/3 less) in terms of practice material.

I am frustrated that I am now in this position, unable to keep up with the recommended amount of practice due to the underestimated study time in 7sage. I am taking the LSAT from the UK so only the June date is available to me - I can’t take it a month later to give myself more practice time.

Although there’s nothing I can do about this now, in hindsight I would have preferred to do an accelerated course curriculum to account for this, giving me more time for practice.

I understand there is no perfect way to calculate the time it takes for every person to complete lessons and drills, but I believe most would prefer overestimation to underestimation. If the study time is overestimated, there are options in the practice blocks to complete additional drills (and it feels like you get free time back). With underestimates, it adds stress to the studier who is trying to stay on top of their study plan. I hope 7sage takes this into account for the future, as this has added a considerable amount of stress for me.

2
User Avatar
angantous
Wednesday, Feb 18

@Kevin_Lin Thanks Kevin! I was able to exclude them from analytics.

1
User Avatar

Wednesday, Feb 18

angantous

😖 Frustrated

Study plan underestimates time - help!

I work full time and I have opted to study part time (7-9 hours/week) using 7sage over the course of 6 months leading up the June LSAT. I finished the course curriculum a few days ago. I noticed that the time estimates for lessons were often underestimates, especially for written lessons with no videos. For example, it would estimate only 3 minutes to read a lesson that was the equivalent of a few pages without including time to take notes.

Additionally, the time estimates for drills did not include any time to watch video explanations for incorrect answers (e.g. 30 min estimate for the time it took to do a drill + BR, not including the additional 15-30 minutes for watching video explanations and reviewing incorrect answers).

I found this additional time spent studying manageable for the course curriculum - the equivalent of 1-2 extra hours on some weeks. However, I just started the Practice component of my study plan. I selected 1-2 hours per day for my first Practice Block. Day 1 included 1x 20 min 2 passage RC drill, 1x 60 min RC section, and 1x 40 min 2 passage RC drill (total estimate 2 hours). Following the instructions for BR and reviewing the incorrect answers, Day 1 took nearly 4 hours. This is not a manageable time commitment on weeknights for someone working full time with other responsibilities. The timed RC drills of course take only 17 minutes, but the 20, and even 40, minute estimates hardly leave time for BR, and definitely do not include time for reviewing incorrect answers after the BR. These included videos ranging from 2 to 15 minutes for 1 RC question.

At this rate, I will not be able to get through half of 1 week study block without doubling my study time which, goes without saying, I simply do not have the time to do. I cannot dedicate more than 1.5-2 hours/day during the work week to studying. While I will of course do longer days for PrepTests on the weekend, this will still not be enough time to complete the study block created by 7sage. I see no options in the settings to decrease the time, as 1-2 hours/day is the shortest offered. If I stick to my max 2 hours study time on week nights, I will quickly fall behind on the Practice Blocks.

I have 2 main questions:

  1. Can 7sage adjust these time estimates so people can plan their study time more realistically? Or, is there a way for me to adjust the settings that I am not seeing?

  2. Does anyone else have experience with this/have recommendations to get study blocks done in the actual 7-9 hours they do have? Should I not do the study blocks at all and instead do drills 5 days per week and 1 prep test?

Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated!!

3
User Avatar
angantous
Tuesday, Feb 17

@Kevin_Lin I also had the exact same passages in the previous lessons. Will getting 100% on these drills mess with my analytics since I did not get 100% when I did them before? Is there a way of deleting these from my analytics?

2
User Avatar
angantous
Monday, Feb 2

kevinnnn

5
User Avatar
angantous
Monday, Jan 19

@Jake. Wondering this as well, he started using these terms in lessons without a dedicated lesson in my study plan

7
User Avatar
angantous
Edited Saturday, Jan 17

How would you know to map it in reverse order if you were seeing this question for the first time? I got this question right because the answer linked the two premises that weren't in the conclusion, but I didn't actually understand why that was the missing link. #help

11
User Avatar
angantous
Sunday, Dec 21, 2025

I find the handwritten notes very hard to follow.

And I agree that LSAT style questions incorporated would be much more beneficial to absorb this information. We all took some form of science classes in school; we know what hypotheses are. What we don't know is how the LSAT use these to trick us!

17
User Avatar
angantous
Tuesday, Dec 16, 2025

@anjjredd For groups 3 and 4 you can negate either idea, but only the 1 you choose to make the sufficient (group 3) or necessary (group 4) condition. The other side is not negated, which is the difference from the contrapositive where you negate both sides!

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?