- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
#help I misread "confusion" as "conclusion" in E during BR. If it had said conclusion, would it be a correct answer?
#help How do we know that the time aspect is a big enough factor to eliminate C? A was so similar in terms of the time aspect that I second guessed myself and chose C, which seemed more broadly and figuratively relevant and so C seemed more likely to be the correct principle.
I chose D immediately, then eliminated it because I thought Ray was using Cynthia's acknowledgement that the trunk had popped open on occasions where the car had not hit a pothole as a premise in his argument. Therefore, he was saying that the trunk popping open could be caused by many different ways and so, not due to the pothole. Thoughts on this? #help
Thanks for hosting this webinar! Tip: Resumes don't have to be limited to 1 page (unless a school specifies that it does), but make sure that you actually need the second page.
I still can't figure out which one of my 3 LR sections was experimental. The only question I remember the section of was about Species X and was near the end of my second LR section (section 3) with 26 questions. I think the order was LR-RC-LR-LR-LG. From what I'm seeing it seems there were 2 versions of experimental LR sections/ordering, one of them with 25 questions and one of them with 26 questions and coming second (like mine). Does it seem like this question was then in the experimental?
@7sagestudentservices said:
Was the LR section with a question about Species X experimental or real? (Second LR section for me.)
Was the LR section with a question about Species X experimental or real? (Second LR section for me.)
Same here. I narrowed down to A and E and chose A. I'm not fully convinced of E...
#help I was just on another parallel flaw question where the contrapositive couldn't not be used in the AC. But here it looks like we do, if we initially diagram it differently. How do we determine when it's appropriate or not?