Discussions

anitra12740

Joined: Apr 2025
Subscription: Free

LSAT · ⚖ Official November 2019 LSAT Discussion Thread ⚖

anitra12740

Tuesday, Nov 26 2019

@izabellanna123610 said:

Did anyone with only two LRs have a question about different med students, trying to diagnose patients, and being told a specific diagnosis from their first advisor, then trying to diagnose again with a second advisor. Or something along the lines of that. It was a really long stimulus, so I’m sure I’m messing up some of the details.

Yes I remember this!

I had LR LG LR LR RC

General · Before Test Day

anitra12740

Sunday, Nov 24 2019

Oh yes! Of course :smiley: 100% have to have that packed up and ready to go. I feel like I'm going on a long trip. Thanks!!!!

General

•

Sunday, Nov 24 2019

anitra12740

Before Test Day

Hi Everyone!

Just wanted to see what everyone is planning on doing before the day on our Nov test day.

For those taking the test, I plan on waking up around 9ish, having a good breakfast, review some light LR, some light LG, maybe one or two RC passages. Afterwards just relax, watch T.V., take a walk and do some things that are lightly stimulating to keep the brain juice flowing. I plan on going to bed around midnight because the test is at 12:30.

Anyone else want to share what they are doing?

PrepTests ·

PT133.S3.Q9

anitra12740

Friday, Nov 22 2019

I feel (B) attacks the argument..... slightly..... and doesn't weaken as much as (C) does.

PrepTests ·

PT113.S4.Q16

anitra12740

Thursday, Nov 14 2019

maybe part to whole? but I would like to know the answer also.

LSAT · PT88.S2.Q15 - Many investors are putting money into stocks

anitra12740

Wednesday, Nov 13 2019

@nikkici377 Thanks for your reply! When you said _"but they cannot be completely neutral, because of the negation test. this really got me thinking. I think sometimes with my AC (not just for NA) sometimes I get flustered and I just fall into traps without double checking. Because in my head I gave myself a rule I must remember that rules with the LSAT are not concrete and I should treat them with a rule of thumb.

Your line of reasoning really made sense to me thanks.

LSAT · PT88.S2.Q15 - Many investors are putting money into stocks

anitra12740

Wednesday, Nov 13 2019

In addition to what @michaelcinco801 said, for me, I saw two things wrong with (B) which led me to pick (C).

1st: 'investment choices' and 'voter political preferences' are not mentioned in the stimulus. This should be a first indicator.

2nd: if we negate (B) to say "the investment choices of voters tend to NOT reflect their political preferences". It does nothing to the argument.

With (C) however, we know what the economic attitudes of investors are because "clearly, these investors are confident in the economy" because they are putting money into stocks. If we negate (C), then the support between the P and C fall apart because how can we say the party now in power will retain power? We can't, it would wreck the argument.

If the economic attitudes of investors DO differ from those of voters in general, then we cannot make our argument.

*Side Note: I am not sure if I am correct about this but NA AC should not be to strong, and the way (C) is worded is subtle enough to provide the support needed. Especially when they say "voters in general". Hopefully I am right about this.

LSAT · Two Weeks Away, Any Advice?

anitra12740

Tuesday, Nov 12 2019

Great advice @lucykelly459

PrepTests ·

PT103.S1.Q11

anitra12740

Tuesday, Nov 12 2019

I want to try and help by giving you two pieces of advice.

1. I have read some of your other comments on SA question frustration and trust me I feel you. You are right that sometimes these SA questions are not fully explained with every little detail. For my 7sage journey, I used it 95% of the time but I also used an online source that helped me when 7sage couldn't just so I could get a second explain. Sometimes reading how someone else explains something helps you. It helped me. Try reading Manhattan and Powerscore forums on there PT. This really helped me when I wasn't getting JY explanation or the comments weren't helping me.

2. In regards to this question you actually don't need to map it. Other people have done a better job at summarizing the correct way to approach this question but I will say that if you really try hard and drill the concepts of SA and give yourself 3-5 days of doing that. Without doing anything else I truly believe you will get the concept and recognize the patterns. You won't become a master or your might but just try :).

General · [SOLVED] Number of problem sets/Q bank attempts deleted?

anitra12740

Friday, Nov 08 2019

@juliet7sage said:

@narissazhao907 I agree with the older view. Does you search box work for LR? Mine is missing.

Correction* Back and functioning :)

General · [SOLVED] Number of problem sets/Q bank attempts deleted?

anitra12740

Friday, Nov 08 2019

@narissazhao907 I agree with the older view. Does you search box work for LR? Mine is missing.

General · Digital Tester for Problem Sets is Live

anitra12740

Friday, Nov 08 2019

@eugenewrotethis726 please read the above comments regarding problem sets.

General · Digital Tester for Problem Sets is Live

anitra12740

Friday, Nov 08 2019

Same! ^ I cannot search for PT or by category for LR. Works for LG and RC. I am using Chrome on a Mac.

General · #HELP

anitra12740

Wednesday, Oct 23 2019

What are your scores in each section?

LSAT · ⚖ Official September 2019 LSAT Discussion Thread ⚖

anitra12740

Tuesday, Oct 15 2019

When will this test appear on 7sage?

PrepTests ·

PT133.S1.Q10

anitra12740

Sunday, Oct 13 2019

I don't know why I can't answer this myself, maybe because I am not 100% fluent in SA language and questions. This is why I need to ask this question here.

In SA questions in general, are there answers choice that support 'only if' C-->P screnioes? Is this a thing for SA question stems? #help

PrepTests ·

PT120.S4.Q14

anitra12740

Friday, Sep 27 2019

This may or may not help you because I find with flaw questions, sometimes there can be MANY reasons and explanations that can confuse you on why answers are right/wrong. You just need to find the one you understand amongst all of them, repeat it, practice it, and eventually learn it.

The technique I used to decipher this question is the play on words in ac (E). Takes for granted, to me, means the author needs x, but instead states y, and therefore no x. The author made no claim or indication in the premise to the conclusion that (x)IF the handwriting had been Milliers, (y)Miller would've been the joker.

For me to pick ac (A), first what stood out to me were the words "....someone else" in the conclusion. Someone else implies someone other then Millier, but what if the joker was Millier and someone else.

This is what led me to pick (A) and eliminate (E).

PrepTests ·

PT115.S4.Q19

anitra12740

Monday, Sep 09 2019

Yes that's true I suppose to a certain extent. Despite this being relatively true we must remember what the fundamentals are when doing a NA. To me, (E) is sort of a restatement of the premises only opposite. Further, (E) could not be the right answer because it doesn't help support the conclusion which talks about the importance of a will.

PrepTests ·

PT115.S4.Q19

anitra12740

Monday, Sep 09 2019

I don't think the author is implicitly stating that. All we know for sure it that one SHOULD have a will. I initially picked (E) at first and then went to (D) in BR. According to the argument (E) is not possible under current laws. (D) however connects the P and C because it hardly supports the argument which is what we want from a NA.

Admissions · Addendum for jobs less than 6 months

anitra12740

Saturday, Aug 31 2019

If the job directly relates and can assist in your PS then I would say yes.In my case I had a summer internship at a law firm for 4 months and I am putting that in my PS and resume.

General · Looking for a study group in downtown Toronto

anitra12740

Friday, Jul 26 2019

Yes I plan to write in November in Toronto!

LSAT · ⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡

anitra12740

Saturday, Nov 17 2018

@faris03501 said:

In the sequence of LR-LG-LR-RC-LR, where bonobos was first, which was the other valid LR? Third or fifth?

Pretty sure the fifth, let me know what you think.

LSAT · ⚡Official November 2018 LSAT Discussion Thread⚡

anitra12740

Saturday, Nov 17 2018

I had LR LG LR RC LR

I am convinced that my 2nd LR was experimental, I had a question stem type lsat hasn't used in like 10? 12? years?????

pllleeaasseee someone tell me that they had a hard time with LR for this set up.

I felt really good about my last LR but the first and second were difficult especially the second lol.

Admissions · 23andme results for applications?

anitra12740

Saturday, Oct 27 2018

I think you should IF discovering this about yourself brought you closer to a specific culture and religion, or maybe you became closer with people in your life and you learned 'x' about yourself because of this. I do however agree with the comments above you should think about not mentioning the Native American unless because of what earlier comments have already stated above ^^^

PrepTests ·

PT131.S1.Q15

anitra12740

Monday, Sep 10 2018

Would anyone classify this question as a circular reasoning flaw?