UGH! rip my streak. I was between A and B but ultimately picked A because it sounded stronger to me, but my gut told me it was confusing sufficiency for necessity. trust your gut folks!

CLAIM!!

#help why is the first sentence a premise instead of context? I'm having a little hard time seeing how it supports the conclusion and doesn't serve as background info

I believe it would be some almonds in California have worms inside because the formula is as follows: A‑m→B, A‑m→C, B←s→C. If you plug all the conditions with their respective terms, you will get: almonds‑m→made in California, almonds‑m→have a worm inside; almonds in California←s→worm inside.

Same!

I WILL SCORE A 160+++++!!!!!

Can someone explain question 5 in greater detail please??

So far so good. I am getting the breakdown of all the foundational stuff first, then eventually getting into heavier material. I feel more confident this time around to prepare for the LSAT.