Not sure if I should tweak it a little or just scrap the entire thing. Let me know! :)
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
@
said:
Hedge fund managing would be fun as well
to be honest, this is my end goal ....... with or without a JD
@ I have alternating waves of unwarranted optimism followed by 100% certainty of doom.
bruh......this is me
how the hell do I go from "hell yea, I think -2 total in LR" to "omg maybe I went -51, I hate everything"
@ Some says that the section 1(LR) has 27 questions
This is most likely not the case.. I promise you you would have seen a lot more people talking about a 27-question LR section.
I keep trying to tell myself that I did well.... normally, in my PT's I'd only be able to get to 20 - 22 questions of the 25 (or 26) in LR, but on game day I was able to get to 24 or 25 for all 3 LR sections that I had, only having to guess 1 for each... Just gotta hang my hat on that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I don't believe you have to pay the fee again... However, I think the fee in the first place is absolutely stupid and bogus!
@ So it seems like they're taking more into consideration? I don't like these games haha.
Forgot to note that I also got a waiver from UPenn..
I like to think that three T14 schools actually want me, but...yea, no lol
I received a fee waiver via email from UVA, but with no specifically stated reason, it just says "We'd like to learn more about you."
Also received a fee waiver from Cornell via email saying that they received my name through the LSAC's Candidate Referral Service and "after taking a quick look at your academic credentials, we want to encourage you to submit an application"
I found Cornell's request odd since my LSAT was not good at all albeit coupled with a very high GPA
How did you do compared to your first diagnostic? I'm very curious since I finish the curriculum next week and start PT'ing the following week.
Was it something drastic?
In addition, timing still seems to be a bit of a problem when drilling. Hopefully when I start PT'ing the rhythm just comes naturally after seeing so many questions!
@
@
said:
3 LRs here as well. I've gotten a lot of feedback on reddit confirming my suspicion that the following questions were experimental: the question about Mexican stone masks with quartz residue in them and then the question about AI making good music. Could anyone else corroborate this (e.g. if you had 2 LR and don't recognize these)?
Can't recall these from my 2 LR sections, so I'd go with experimental
whew, hope you're right iggy... I had 3 LR like karlxia. That mexican quartz stone mask question & that AI making good music question both killed me under timed pressure
So the consensus is that if you're able to take PTs in the actual room that you're taking the LSAT, do it, right? I would have to agree with this notion. Not many people have this luxury, but I do. So far I've taken a total of 3 PTs after re-doing the curriculum. 2 were in the actual room (which is at my university), 1 was in my university's library. However, for the PTs which were in the actual room, I was faced with a myriad of distractions and interruptions that I don't think would be present on D Day: my university decides that NOW is a wonderful time to start repaving that beat-up street in front of the room (imagine jack hammering, huge trucks scraping up the demolished pieces of concrete, the constant beeping of those trucks when they go in reverse), also a janitor decides that cleaning said room is absolutely imperative to the functioning of the university: arranging chairs to desks, throwing out the garbage bins that have no garbage in them, and just walking around the room aimlessly which was incredibly distracting (mind you, it's just a big room that no classes are ever held in). Now for the cherry on top, the room adjacent to this room is undergoing some sort of construction as well: drilling holes, hammering, literally anything that could make noise. I had to Pause mid-PT until noises died down a little.
I was definitely off of my game for those PTs in the actual room and it showed with my scores.
However, for the PT I took in the library, it was perfect. Some noise, but definitely not inhibiting my ability to focus...and it showed with my score. (this was the highest score I received to date)
What I'm asking is: should I not continue taking tests in the room and take them in the library? Getting accustomed to the actual testing environment is important, but not with all that noise/distractions, right?
I scrapped an older version and drafted a whole new PS.
Need someone to read it. I'm looking to apply to schools within the next week.
@ don't think we can do that /:
@ The "misunderstood" question only just now came back to me. That was a really tough one!
Just remembered it too, it was tough. I remember reading it over like 3 times then finally seeing where they misunderstood.
@ Notice many NA and Paradox questions overboard
I swear thats all I remember from the LR sections.. bizarre
My 3 recent PTs I have experienced an oddity.....my timing is deplorable.....
For prior PTs I would reach question 21 or 22 in each LR section when time is called.....but for my 3 most recent PTs I only finish up to number 17.
By the 30 minute mark I am only on question 15.... why is this happening? I feel so much slower than before! I have to read, then re-read, then re-read again, the stimulus before going to the answer choices...
@ My writing sample included the phrase "go big or go home" LOL.
LMAO
Carlene Boulevard or GTFO
@
@
said:
LR was kinda easy which makes me nervous that they had really good trick answers...
Ditto!! I am highly concerned as well...
AGREED!
This is both a general question and a question directed to any person who is reading this (how do you drill?)
Let's say I miss a few weaken questions on my latest PT, is there a certain amount of weaken questions that I should drill? say, 10 or 15?
Background: Ok so prior to 7sage I self-studied. I made my own schedule using the PowerScore books and the LSAT Trainer. After completing my own "core curriculum" I started PT'ing using the Cambridge bundle (1-40 split by type, and 41-70 in four-section PTs). After taking 5 PTs (41-45), I realized that I needed to sign up for a course because I was getting answers wrong and had no clue why they were wrong. Ultimately, I signed up for a 7sage course. I completed 7sage's core curriculum and started taking PT's a couple weeks ago (starting with PT 36). I took PTs 36-40 by viewing the LR questions on 7sage's website (where JY reviews answers of that respective PT), and did RC and LG using the Cambridge "split by type" books... Although my scores for PT 36-40 were not much higher (went from avg of 150 before 7sage to 154 after using 7sage), I am seeing improvement....
Now, here's where I need you to help me out: I just completed BR for PT 41. My real score was a 168 and my BR score was 171 (previously my score for this PT was 150).... Yes, I have completed this PT before....BUT...I legitimately did not recall ANY games/answers for the LG section (went -0), nor any passages/answers for the RC section (went -4... completed 3 passages thoroughly and only got 1 wrong then guessed all "D" for the last passage which got me 3 wrong on that passage). However, I did recall only about 3 or 4 questions in total from both LR sections combined.
What do I make of this huge jump?? Do you think I subconsiously recalled questions/answers??
Sorry for such a wordy post, but I'm cautiously ecstatic and I would really appreciate any input !
.....what gives bro? I feel that these are so much harder than earlier ones that I've taken. I'm marking somewhere around 20 questions for BR in each LR section. Just took PT 66 and I feel like I just got rekt; felt like I was just reading words and not understanding them.
I've read that as you go higher in the PTs, the harder they get...but dang.
so far for me: Miami, FSU, FIU, WUSTL, Notre Dame.
I have a pretty weird situation on my hands...
In my past 5 PTs I have increased my score, ultimately leading up to the highest score I've ever achieved (WOOHOO!). I was scheduled to take another PT this week but it was a train wreck in the first section, my timing was sooooo bad, I damn-near circled the entire section for BR. I decided to not finish the PT because I was clearly off my game. To be honest, it felt like it was my first time seeing an LR question. Leading up to the PT I was as motivated as ever: drilling/reviewing/the usual, etc... However, that ONE section of that unfinished PT really rattled me; so much so that my study sessions in the following days were so unmotivated and discouraging, I didn't put my heart into it (sorry for the cliche). If I had to describe how I feel, I'd say that I feel as if I'm suffering from some type of brain fog, in other words I'm having trouble going through the motions, which is weird since just a week ago I had scored the highest I had ever scored! Has this happened to anyone before?
I don't really think I'm burnt out, I've burnt out once (leading up to the December '15 test), so I feel like I know what it's like.
I have a 10-day vacation starting on monday that I've been planning with family for quite some time and I'm wondering if my brain subconsciously took off before I did. If so, I'm hoping that the time off will help me in some way.
FWIW, I just finished BR'ing my latest PT after a lengthy 3 1/2 day break and scored on the higher end of my PT scoring spectrum!
Just wanted to share with all of you the value in letting your brain rest and dealing with burnout.
I started 7sage's lessons on RC today and I still feel clueless/helpless. First, I'd like to ask if anyone has seen dramatic improvement using the memory method. I gave it a test run today and I'm a bit skeptical (not counting it out, just my $.02 at the moment!). Fwiw, prior to 7sage I did a lot of practice sections and I would miss over half of the questions... In addition, I'm thinking of incorporating ideas from the trainer into 7sage's ideas, would you recommend this? They're not that drastically different.
Holy Moly, the stats for question #16.. I contributed to that humongous tower depiction for (E).. Tough question bc (E) looks so right
I actually found this passage to be fun and interesting to read.. This DEFINITELY plays a part in how well you understand and interact with the questions/answers
for #4 I couldn't really differentiate between "open dissatisfaction" and "whimsical dismissal" ..... so i just guessed the latter and ended up getting it wrong. smh.
In the lessons that cover conditional reasoning (existential/universal quantifiers), I get almost every single practice problem correct...however, when going through actual LSAT problems, I can't seem to translate what the stimulus is saying into Lawgic. I feel that if I can only nail down this one specific problem-area down, I can answer more questions correctly... help?
@ I had a notification from LSAC today:
Turned out it was just to say my transcript had posted
this literally made me LOL
Took PT 38 Friday and finished BR today..
One thing that I've just realized up to this point in my studies: it's better to confidently complete 20 LR questions in a section than trying to rush through the entire thing half-assed... I tested this out and my LR really improved (5 more questions correct than my average, a big jump for me IMO). I bubble in D for the rest, but during BR I've gotten the correct answer for some.
I'm hoping that with time my speed will get better and I'll be able to answer all questions in a given LR section with a high degree of confidence.
YES. Those damn geico commercials are burned into my brain!
I know it's only a *very* small sample size of 2 PTs, but how do I go about assessing my weaknesses?
My stats: -2 Avg. for LG... -11 Avg. for LR... -13 Avg. for RC
For LR do I go drill the question types that have a "higher priority"? Or is there another characterization that I should be looking at?
For RC I'm just going to keep doing passage after passage after passage to practice.
(Also, I'm thinking about just focusing on completing/devoting almost all of the allotted time to 3 passages while I'm PT'ing instead of all 4, would you advise against this?)
whew... Thought i was the only one burnt out with the test so close. Taking friday-sunday off, thank god football is back, should occupy my weekend! back at it monday.
....and I'm neither angry nor happy. I got a 153 (159 BR). The reason why I'm not completely angry is because it's actually a 3 point increase from where I was PT'ing prior to enrolling in the 7sage course (I took about 5 PTs after self studying).
I have to find happiness/reasons for celebration in whichever forms they come, no matter how small.
I'm really curious to see if I can increase my score some more. There was definitely some questions on the test that I know I could've gotten correct but my nerves got to me.
So I'm going to have ~22 weeks to take PTs after I finish the curriculum this week. I want to take a reasonable amount of PTs, yet not over do it like how I did the last time I studied for this test (took December 2015 LSAT); I took 3 PTs a week, with crappy BR to follow and basically no time at all for drilling. I'd like to change that this time around. With that said, I have 10 fresh PTs (several in the 50's, 60's, and 70's) but also plan on re-taking other PTs. Here are my questions:
How should I go about planning my PTs? Should I start off with 1 PT per week then move on to 2 per week?
What PT # should I start at? Start from PT 41 and work my way up?
After a 2 month break (and a more recent week-long trip which was extended thanks to a winter storm), I am fully committing myself to study for the LSAT again. I took the December exam and did absolutely horrible, a score that I'm legitimately embarrassed to reveal, a score that I KNOW is not indicative of what I am capable of scoring. I didn't even bother applying anywhere because what the hell was the point... I basically took a 2 month hiatus from LSAT/TLS/7sage. I actually feel refreshed and looking forward to study for this S.O.B again. The positive thing about already taking it is that I know what DIDN'T work: taking 3 PT's a week, followed by a crappy BR session afterwards... not learning from mistakes on PTs... barely drilling... barely exercising and not relieving stress/anxiety... barely working in order to study (I seriously took 1.5 months off prior to my exam)... not mimicking test-day as well as I thought did... I can go on and on, unfortunately.....
I have 10 fresh PTs (plus whatever most recent PTs are available that I'll purchase which will bring the total to about 14 or 15, right?). I'm really thinking about re-taking in October because I honestly don't feel that June is enough time for ME. I believe that October will allow me to balance LSAT / Life / Small Vacations / Work... June feels rushed to me.
I plan to take a PT every other week in the exact room I took the actual exam, followed by BR and drilling, something I didn't really do despite having the cambridge bundle! I've been going to the gym since Jan 1st (new year, new me watch out watch out haha), gotten into a routine and whatnot. Also plan to work more than I did before (work at my family's business, so hours are lenient which is how I took 1.5 months off as previously mentioned).
How should I go about getting things back into motion, getting the juices flowing?
Do you feel that waiting til October is worse than taking in June?
I'm starting again on Monday the 8th.
@ @.Sieradzki PM'ed the both of you individually! thank you so much. So sorry for a late reply, had a very hectic past 24 hours.

hmmm I don't recall seeing one either.