Simple explanation:

A) We have no evidence to know if there is only a small amount of evidence from -- " I talk to these people"

B) He is surveying the opinion of the people who shop at the store... surveying people about opinions about how people feel is not a flaw

C) Does not generalize about the entire neighborhood, the conclusion is about his store

D) Why I got this wrong is I was looking for a representation flaw and did not connect that representation sample flaw means bias sample for some reason....

E) E doesn't impact the conclusion...... if the business isnt being negatively impacted, then the homie's conclusion is right...

@robnav I got you with my explanation, bro basically the underlying structure of the argument is:

• if appearance alone determine whether something was art or not then Warhols boxes would not be considered art

• but they are considered art

• so it’s not true that it’s appearance alone

• if you plot that to E it says

• if a particular thesis were correct is actually true ( if appearance alone, determined if the boxes were art)

• Showing something would be impossible. ( they would not be considered art but in reality the boxes being considered art so its impossible)

@HudaHussaini

I think being stuck in LSAT land really is mind bogging. Think about it, If you are not surprised that a buisness failed it means you expected it to fail. Would you invest in your sisters nail salon if you knew she was going to be lazy and just spend your investment on a trip to lifestyle trip Peru. That makes it a risky investment for you

you can shift to low effort tasks like making summaries for1-2 star questions or reviewing concepts you are working on. maybe even scheduling your study plan, including planning an a earlier time to sleep.

Pretty much understand everything except one thing, please help me 7Sage wizards

Most opera singers who add demanding roles to their repertoires at a young age lose their voices early. It has been said that this is because their voices have not yet matured and hence lack the power for such roles. But young singers with great vocal power are the most likely to ruin their voices. The real problem is that most young singers lack the technical training necessary to avoid straining their vocal cords—especially when using their full vocal strength. Such misuse of the cords inevitably leads to a truncated singing career.

E)Most young opera singers who sing demanding roles strain their vocal cords

Young Opera singers -most> loose voice

Young Opera singers -most> lack tech training to avoid loosing voice

Isn’t the valid inference

A most B

A most C

___

Bsome C ???

I thought B most C was invalid…..

Sorry I meant B some C, so some opera singers who loose their voice lack tech training, thanks!

@KevinLin Ok this was helpful, im trying to be as literal as possible. I am not sure why it turns out that way in my brain. Thank you again.

@KevinLin can you chime in in why "inaccurate solely on the basis of the source of those claims" is correct. Again from my understanding, the claims are inaccurate because they work on comission. I do not understand how it is implied, that the claims are inaccurate solely because they are salespeople. Am I looking at this incorrectly?

@EricBroner Yes thank you

@KevinLin got it thanks

It describes the flaw, but no way in hell is that descriptively accurate.