I am looking for someone who has been studying for the LSAT in the mid-160's and who is enrolled in Live Classes and is a fairly regular attendee and by regular I mean at least one session a day. I am looking for someone to talk to during class and by talk I mean exchanging specific questions about what the instructor is covering because I have noticed many times, questions and comments being lost in the chat, and they are never addressed so I hope this will help you as much as it helps me. if anything, it will help us to keep focus at least. and I mostly want to try to answer your questions so I won't be messaging you questions. the only exception will be during office hours because for those I leave once I have my question answered. And there aren't any obligations with this commitment; if for any reason we try this out and it doesn't work we don't have to have a formal discussion about stopping, we could just stop. During live classes, my name in the zoom will always be Ashley.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
These study groups should have a way of verifying test scores, maybe by letting users input their latest practice exams (the more the better) into these things because as it is, this is just the honor system all over again.
I chose answer choice C for #22 and don't understand why it is incorrect. In the second paragraph, it states that while the media and Hollywood studios are interlinked, the mass media NOW does MOST of the work promoting the stuff Hollywood studios wants. Doesn't that suggest the media is more dependent on Hollywood studios now than they used to be?
As for #26, it says the problem is that studio execs are the ones who increasingly have a say; doesn't C say no to this?
Then: HBO Max
Now: Max
._.
Dude, why does this look like something from a must be true or sufficient assumption type question? are they trying to mind-f*ck me?
...Then doesn't this mean the notation for the first sentence ought to be written differently in order to avoid confusion with the implications of the second? Someone can still believe something exists or not exists even if the belief itself is false. There are so many mental barriers to getting this one correct I just don't see how it's possible in a timed setting even if you get the typical LR questions correct.
The most discouraging thing about admissions is that nearly everybody in the applicant pool pretty much got stats and resume like these. I'm seeing people with stellar numbers and two page long resumes and the stuff they got in these resumes aren't fluff either.
Dude why this so hard. It’s passage 1 like can you at least make me feel a little better before destroying me?
I am so bad at analogy questions...
Not enough people are talking about #23...
Like geez with answer choice C. I picked it and moved on without looking at answer choices D and E and fell face first.
I've said this before and I will say it again: this explanation vid flies by D waaayyy too quick.
I knew I was in trouble as soon as I saw the phrase "riddled basins of attraction."
You can still think something is good for you even if you didn't choose it though....that's what gets me about D.
Why do I so often miss questions nobody else seems to struggle on?
It has been like a decade and still no one in the comments can explain why A is definitely wrong.
Everybody in the comments be talking about D while I'm here alone with E.
I am revisiting this passage and I still think answer choice D for number 6 is just so cold and it's unfortunate that the xplanation video just breezed past it as if it were no consequence.
The RC portion of the CC needs to be beefed up.
This question is the epitome of why I hate these higher-level disagree questions. I see several people in the comments who eliminated C because Lurano didn't talk about funding but in that case, how on earth is E justified? The choice also mentions research FUNDING considerations?
What color and gender is the kitty? It would help with the names