@ said:

Literally me, even though they are typically the harder passages. I feel like it's honestly because I start to get into a little bit more of a groove and for some reason stop second guessing myself, but I don't know how to fix this for test day :(

Did anyone else not map this? I feel like it makes more sense just to read it straight through and understand that the stimulus is implying it must be one or the other, but not both, when we're given no facts to believe this. Aka, false dichotomy.

I genuinely had never been more ready to give up after reading the first paragraph of a passage of my life, I almost cried.

E got me so good because I immediately read LIKE social lives, which would separate jobs having better performances and social lives as having worse, and then didn't even realize until blind review that it just combined REAL jobs and social lives into one category. But I totally liked E better because it clarified more studying = better academic performance which A didn't do. Now I feel totally stupid because I just completely ignored real full-time jobs and only saw social lives lmao... massive face palm, but good to learn from! Sorry for the rant, I just find it funny that I can get level 3,4, and 5 right no problem, and then overthink and make stupid mistakes on level 1s and 2s, please tell me I'm not the only one haha.

I'm going to be so honest; I had no idea what a confectioner was. Lmaoooo

I feel like this explanation is misguiding people to assume that you can never contrapose PSA(r or a) question types, or at least that's what it sounds like. B is just wrong because it is still using the CAN make a practical joke as the necessary condition and the not contempt and not harm as sufficient conditions, if they were reversed and it was both, it would satisfy the contrapositive of changing or to "and". Maybe I'm overthinking it but it felt like JY was saying you can never contrapose a rule, haha.

I made this question so much harder than it needed to be (still got it right), but contraposed every clause individually, then chained, then undid the contrapositive. For some reason my brain couldn't see the direct link at first facepalm

#help

Should we be writing the low res summaries down on our scratch paper, or should we be memorizing them?