How do I transfer my subscription/account to the new website?

C would be the correct flaw if it said fatalities instead of accidents. I fell for this one too lol.

The more I think about this AC the more I realize how many assumptions is needed to justify it. Absolutely wild.

YUP!

#help Feel like "acquired confirmation" does not automatically entail "credible evidence"

its very vague

eel like answer choice E has the same 'outside the scope of the stimulus' flaw that D has. Like I don't care about out of province expenditures... the stimulus clearly states its focused on stimulating our own "province's economy'

Ps --> Ex vs Ex --> PS

#help can someone explain the order of it, why is it PS considered C and not A/ why is Ex considered A and not C, whats the logical reasoning behind the ordering?

So what about news outlets? What about the actual people that attend the speeches in person?

Also even if we do include news outlets, some may still include that first part as well. Bad question.

YES, I thought I was tweaking lol

Yes, upon review I realized I was putting the glucose/pesticide together when they are two different things entirely with no relation in regards to this question.

but you still need to make an assumption that it is an alternative explanation.

"you just need to make the assumption" this goes against like EVERYTHING we have been taught when identifying correct answer choices. Especially cause pollution does not CAUSE cancer but is instead correlated.

I got it right, but at what cost (nearly 4 mins)

This question takes a long time

Once you get the logic down in stimulus, doesn't seem too hard but it could definitely take a long time to sift through the answer choices.

Yeah I think site is down.

Same. I think its because even if you get the conditional logic all correct (which can be tough on the 4/5 star questions), you still have to make a jump from understanding a gap (which purposely doesn't exist in the stimulus), and connecting it to an answer choice that you sometimes have to decipher. The conditional strategy only really helps you identify where the gap is, not exactly "what" the gap is.

I don't understand how we can insert an 'or' in triggering one of the two premises to determine existence. I only see "and" in the stimulus. Instead the explanation says we can determine existence if we can send craft (not near future) or they are intelligent (we can communicate). I just don't see this 'or'

Do contrapositives still work for these types of frameworks? I noticed the answer choices did not include contrapositives.

In Q14, how is the forgoing the use of history in common law paradoxical. Maybe I am not understanding the use of the word paradoxical here.

How are we supposed to know subtype = the same disease? I am not a scientist???

The stimuli only talks about migrations, one would have to make a serious assumption that the a population only stays put because of climate. There could be a host of other reasons that are not enumerated so it's confusing why the answer would state 'only' The word 'only' is very exclusive.