I was thinking our boi curator decides what to sell so i was like "meh whatever B ok"
so i need to know the law (not responding does not count as affirmation) before going to law school, to pass the LSAT. cool guys.
I thought D wasn't good enough because it was talking about EVERY novel out there.. "a novel's" whereas the argument just speaks to ONE novel #help #stupid
they got me with this one 'laughable' = 'absurd'. ok, LSAC. ok.
Thanks my man! but do you find it that you have time to do all of that in like 1:30mins?
goddamn answer D took me 150hours to understand that sentence. #FML
Hi Friends!
I'm wondering when I should use the lawgic notation vs when not to use it.. sometimes it's less challenging for me to rely on intuition + general understanding than to draw the relationships.. and the thing is that often times by the time I figure out that I need to use lawgic - it's already too late and I need to pass over to the next question..
any thoughts??
Thanks!!
The lawgic took me more time to draw up than to go by intuition + logic... are you drawing up every single question? I guess I'm not sure when to draw it up and when not to...
The question stem pushed me in a completely unrelated direction.. dammit.
#help I chose C and then switched to A...
C - None of the paintings currently recognized as the work of his students contains that thing...
well... could this be the first one???
#help why is B the right answer here? the stim doesn't say anything about 'various other species'... it only talks about dinosaurs.. I thought this one for sure is a trap answer..
Ya.. that's what tripped me off.. the fact that it wasn't the conclusion. Appreciate your quick help! <3
She literally says 'saying something that is wrong CAN NEVER BE other than morally wrong'. 'can never be' = always.. That's what threw me off. I'm very sensitive to over-generalizations but this one doesn't seem to be the case...
C got me. #fooled