it's so funny because i chose A in my drill set but in this explanation he doesn't even give that answer choice the time of day lol (i am so cooked)

Trash bin is weak because someone else could have knocked over the trash and Mr. Fat Cat just reaped the benefits. Or maybe he did not intentionally knock over the bin maybe it was an accident and it just so happened that the consequence was yummy. Maybe he was licking his paws from eating something else that fell out and the salmon was stuck in the bin or slid out of his line of vision. The language in the trash bin one really doesn't help it.

The Tiger one is second weakest because the word "can". A well trained Tiger might be suitable. Even so, with the logic given in the argument, I believe that you'd have to go through every mammal and explain why only some are suitable and some are not. Picking a Tiger was arbitrary and can be picked apart easily, though valid (in other words, not enough evidence as to why a Tiger was the example of choice).

Disney one was the strongest because the "either or"-- "all or nothing" type of language. That left no room for other methods of getting the plus pass. It was either you did one thing or the other. Since goofy didn't do one thing, it is extremely possible that he absolutely had to do the other because of his access to the app.

Tiger:

Not all beds in the mattress store are suitable for every individual shopping around. After all, firm mattresses aren't as soft as plush mattresses.

Disney:

People who can afford Stanely cups usually have at least one. Those who want two cups can bundle with a 20% discount in one transaction. Those who purchase two cups in two separate transactions must pay full price for each, despite their purchase history. My friend Janet has two Stanely cups but she never got a discount. Therefore, she must have bought them through two separate transactions.

Mr. Fat Cat (such a cute name)

My mom said that she wanted a new iPhone for Christmas. My dad went to the Apple store the day after without explaining why. On Christmas day, there was a gift under the tree for my mom that was an iPhone, but it didn't say who it was from. My hypothesis is that my dad bought the phone for my mom.

hot tip:

i almost got tripped up on this question but i did a big brain thing by asking myself "what is the premise supporting"? I couldn't tell if the second sentence was the conclusion or the sentence after. the support of the argument cleared that up. don't think i've used that tactic before!

when i grow up i want to be just like j.y.

these comments really help me understand the lessons so much better