Hi all. I started studying with 7Sage on V1, not knowing there was a V2. I am only taking LSATs in the future that will be without the LG section. I recently switched to V2, but it appears that there are not videos for most of the content as they are working on making them currently. I'm not sure whether to continue with V2 or go back to V1. I felt that I was more engaged with the videos and overall doing better with my studying, but I don't want to be at a disadvantage for the new test by doing V1 content. Please help with any advice!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I did the same thing, but I think E is probably right because it emphasizes the word "evolution" of rights. The introduction of the Fur Seal Treaty allows us to see how the rights changed or evolved over time. Without mention of the Treaty, we wouldn't have any change happening. C still feels very tempting to me but we don't know how"well-known" the precedent really is and it is mainly geared towards sea otters rather than the generalized "protected animals" that the answer gives us.
How do we know that the segment on "new support for the hypothesis..." is the author's perspective and not just additional context?
How can we distinguish between the critique/debate and phen-hypo style for this kind of passage?
Is it recommended to use scratch paper when completing these low resolution summaries on the actual test? I don't know if I'd be able to remember so many different opinions from one passage.
The reason I didn't pick E is because it said none of the candidates already work for Arvue. From the stimulus, I thought that "none of the fully qualified candidates" work for the company meant that there are some that do work for the company already but are not fully qualified for the said position. That's why I picked B at first.
So is the second example valid or is it confusing sufficiency for necessity?
I know they are currently working on video content but it would be nice of them if they were to give us a date for when things will come out, especially considering we are all studying on a time constraint and are paying for a subscription that is supposed to include videos
I am also confused about this! Someone else was saying it has to do with whether or not they have an upper bound. Maybe because most does not have an upper bound? However, all also does not have an upper bound so there is still some confusion there for me.
I've been under the impression that we are not supposed to question the truths of premises on the LSAT so I am just wondering if there are certain questions when it is okay to do so and how we know when it's okay and when it's not..