Hi all. I started studying with 7Sage on V1, not knowing there was a V2. I am only taking LSATs in the future that will be without the LG section. I recently switched to V2, but it appears that there are not videos for most of the content as they are working on making them currently. I'm not sure whether to continue with V2 or go back to V1. I felt that I was more engaged with the videos and overall doing better with my studying, but I don't want to be at a disadvantage for the new test by doing V1 content. Please help with any advice!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
The reason I didn't pick E is because it said none of the candidates already work for Arvue. From the stimulus, I thought that "none of the fully qualified candidates" work for the company meant that there are some that do work for the company already but are not fully qualified for the said position. That's why I picked B at first.
How do we know that the segment on "new support for the hypothesis..." is the author's perspective and not just additional context?
I've been under the impression that we are not supposed to question the truths of premises on the LSAT so I am just wondering if there are certain questions when it is okay to do so and how we know when it's okay and when it's not..
How can we distinguish between the critique/debate and phen-hypo style for this kind of passage?
So is the second example valid or is it confusing sufficiency for necessity?
Is it recommended to use scratch paper when completing these low resolution summaries on the actual test? I don't know if I'd be able to remember so many different opinions from one passage.
For number 6, how do we know which conditions are the necessary versus sufficient? I had thought that acquiring knowledge would come at the end of the chain.
Interested!