I came up with a totally different low-res summary before Kevin started breaking it down, but I think this is still understandable and maybe even short enough to write on test day. I don;t I won't have to rely on writing stuff down by then.
1) intro
ctx.
2. ast.
period
short time-only local
It gives me enough information that I can just recant the arguments in my head.
What would you think about using the highlighting tool for marking the breaks in really large paragraphs? That way it is more visually distinctive and it's much quicker to go back and find your place. I hear that the tool can be a little clunky and that it might sacrifice too much time to try and use it. What are your thoughts?
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
27 comments
(1) make a low-resolution summary
diff theories trying to explain the evidence from the moon samples and size of craters.
(2) identify different perspectives and the author’s attitude
sci 1 - LHB result of big asteroid désintégration
sci 2 - disagree and say latter impacts obliterated evidence of earlier impacts
sci 3 - brief duration and existed between earth and moon
(3) predict the direction of the next paragraph.
offer authors own opinion
astronomy for athletes LOL
I would indeed expect the moon to be peppered with all kinds of crater's.
Anyone else having fun with this stuff or is it just me?
hellian
Now I'm thinking about the HBO series "From Earth to the Moon"
Group 1: One big boom, because big craters.
Group 2: Many small booms, later booms covered up earlier booms.
Group 3: One mid-size boom, because boom was too short and localized to be super-big.
I deeply hate any science-related passages :(
I came up with a totally different low-res summary before Kevin started breaking it down, but I think this is still understandable and maybe even short enough to write on test day. I don;t I won't have to rely on writing stuff down by then.
1) intro
ctx.
2. ast.
period
short time-only local
It gives me enough information that I can just recant the arguments in my head.
"I'm not aware of God the janitor" made me laugh out loud
Wow. I tried doing my own low-res summaries for this passage. This was insanely hard for me to understand. Ugh.
How can we distinguish between the critique/debate and phen-hypo style for this kind of passage?
What would you think about using the highlighting tool for marking the breaks in really large paragraphs? That way it is more visually distinctive and it's much quicker to go back and find your place. I hear that the tool can be a little clunky and that it might sacrifice too much time to try and use it. What are your thoughts?
Science RC Passages are like Xandlebars, got my eyes heavy with no backwoods
If anyone's looking for a laugh my low-res summary was:
Group 1- big boom and boom everywhere
Group 2- many small boom all the time
Group 3- big but constrained boom
When you do these paragraph breaks, are you eventually supposed to do them in your head like low res summaries, or physically mark up the page?
Low Res
Hypo 1 - Cataclysm and Solar system
Hypo 2 - /Cataclysm and Solar system
Hypo 3 - Cataclysm and /Solar system