User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

I did a level 4 MC question earlier (PT 126/S1/Q18 if you're curious), and I am realizing that I struggle knowing how to differentiate the context from the conclusion. Sometimes, typically on easier questions, it is obvious to me, but on harder ones like this, it is hard for me to understand it. I am fairly good at differentiating support from the conclusion, but the context throws me off since it is sometimes used as a reference rather than as support.

Does anyone have any tips? Thanks!

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, Jun 26

When I PT, I listen to the same two songs in the background (Isimo and MCPDC by the Bleachers, if you're curious), but I also typically end up pausing it for long stretches and do my best to operate with just natural background noise. I plan on going to the library a lot in July when I PT to mimic the environment better, though.

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, Jun 26

Take some gap years. If law school is still your passion, give another crack at the LSAT then.

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Wednesday, Jun 25

I totally get it. I'm not transferring bc I don't feel like fixing my data this far in, but yeah, I understand. Though I will say I think 7sage still has the cheapest waiver option. I know some other sites are still a higher amount a month

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Tuesday, May 20

#feedback it would be nice if the thumbnails for the videos were not on screengrabs that show certain answers being x'd out. I get some of the wrong answers spoiled before I even have the chance to try it myself.

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Tuesday, May 20

#feedback it is really difficult to see how well the sequential approach is working for me when the same passage(s) are used. I already remember the answers

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Monday, May 19

On the real test, we can see the passage while going through answers still, right? So there isn't much time harm in clicking through a question to see if it applies?

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Monday, May 19

#feedback would really appreciate if the correct answers were also given for proper contrast

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Monday, May 19

My timing needs work, but only missed 2 on hard

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Wednesday, Jun 18

I'd assume it would be for question type, flaw types, and conditional indicators. I didn't do flashcards but made giant notecards for question and flaw types, then I have a "cheat sheet" of conditional indicators.

User Avatar

Thursday, May 15

cbrianne1570

Law School Resume and the Bar

For law school applications (and future bar admission), how should I go about what jobs I include? I started working at 17, and my first job I was at for really around 4 years, but I quit a couple times and came back, always on good terms and it was a normal thing at that job. There were some jobs after age 18 where I was at for one day, a couple of weeks, or just one week before realizing it wouldn't be a good fit, and I'd find other options. All retail and service jobs, and these short jobs were always outweighed by other jobs that were great experiences. I would just hate to get through law school only to get struck down by the bar for a resume issue.

Who does the LSAC consider a "qualified professional"? I have a licensed professional counselor who, in the state I am in, is licensed to diagnose and treat, and her "expertise" is within my diagnoses. I'm getting ready to get everything together for accommodations, but I am so confused what they would consider.

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Wednesday, May 14

Just commenting to celebrate i got every question right for this passage. Maybe it was because it was only level 3 reading difficulty, maybe it was because I love humanities. But a win is a win

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Sunday, Jul 13

Nice AI work lmao

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Sunday, May 11

13/14 then 14/14 but my timing is so off.

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Sunday, May 11

Isn't C also wrong because it specifies animals but the law was only about one animal? It would lose accuracy points.

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Saturday, May 10

Obviously barring that E was not the answer it is, could D have merit if this was an inference question? idk what's wrong with me that i totally looked past E

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Saturday, May 10

What the flip was this, and is the curve forgiving on these questions... :( I kinda wish it was a You Try so that I could've had more ease with referring back to the passage.

When I first looked at A, I was confused because I didn't understand how airtime equated to understanding access. I read it as access to TV rather than generic access to imported. Because of this misreading, I opted for E even though I wasn't confident with it (but understood it more than A).

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Friday, May 09

With that, does anyone know if this one has the same content as the new one, or am I missing out on content?

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, May 08

The second passage I had was absolutely monstrous.

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, May 08

I got a level 5 question right after getting so much of this passage wrong. There is hope <3

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, May 08

This passage is defeating me...

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, May 08

This seems to be more of an Implied question vs a Stated question to me. We have no idea when the "later" technique was actually developed based on the passage, only that it was "later."

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, May 08

I ruled out A so confidently and chose D so confidently... My first thought with A was "Ok, but just because it didn't impact Mars doesn't mean it still didn't impact others."

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, May 08

Am I going insane or has some version of this passage been used before in the curriculum? I haven't taken this prep test before, but I'm having a major deja vu moment.

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, May 08

14/15 then 15/15 on medium <3

User Avatar
cbrianne1570
Thursday, Jun 05

I'd be interested!

User Avatar

Monday, May 05

cbrianne1570

First Gen Letter of Rec Advice

I swear recommenders ghosting you is a necessary part of the application process.

Anyway, back in early March, I reached out to three professors (I graduated 2023) to see if they'd be willing to write for me, and all of them said yes. 2/3 have completed the letters, but one of them still hasn't, despite me asking for it to be completed by the end of April. When they said they would do it, they asked for extra materials like a rough personal statement, which I provided. No response, which is fine. Since then, I have emailed them a reminder with a resent LSAC link (another recommender wanted a reminder, so I sent them to any remaining recommenders), and no response. At this point, I'm not sure what to do. This recommender enthusiastically said they would write for me and very clearly remembered me, but I've gotten zilch. I know the end of their semester was a lot, which is why when I emailed them and said end of April, I included this acknowledgement and that if they had another target date in mind to please let me know.

What are some recommended steps? I'm not sure how active this person is on their email during the summer. Should I tweak my resume and send it as a "hey, here is an updated document to better help you" or something like that?

I plan on sending my apps in September/right when I get my August LSAT back, so waiting for their fall semester to start seems less than ideal. Should I just reach out to a former employer instead? (I'm SE now and work under an NDA, so I can't ask someone in my current position).

It seems like ghosting recommenders are part of the process, and I would love some advice for how to move forward. I've never really needed to ask for a letter of rec before, so someone ghosting me is all new, and I'm a first gen so I don't have anyone I can really ask.

Anyway, in early March, I reached out to three profs (graduated 2 years ago) to see if they'd be willing to write for me. They all enthusiastically said yes, and 2/3 have written their letters (yay!). But another has completely ghosted me. I had asked for it to be completed by the end of April and if that was a problem for them to please let me know what their target date could be, and that hasn't happened. When they agreed, they asked for a resume and a rough personal statement, so I sent them that and got no response. No sweat. As it neared my given deadline, I sent them a reminder, again including that if they need a different date to let me know because I completely understand how busy the time can be. Again, absolutely no response. I am taking the August LSAT and planning on submitting my apps when I get that score back, so I would be wary on waiting for their fall semester to start up since that would be when I am already submitting them and would be an ASAP request, which likely wouldn't help me.

I'm nervous about sending another reminder because I don't want to make them upset. Should I tweak my resume (I could add more work history since I have a bit of experience), then send it with the idea of "I updated some of my materials and think they may help you as you write"? Or, should I just throw in the towel and ask a former employer instead? My worry with the former employer is that they may use ChatGPT for it, and I'm not sure if admissions would frown upon me for that. Again, first gen, so I just have no clue. Thank you for any help! :)

Confirm action

Are you sure?