I just got a great score on PT157 yesterday, but I have heard that the currently administered LSATs don't seem representative of practice materials. How much truth is there to that? Should I be doing anything else, like drilling just 4s and 5s, for the real thing?
I did a level 4 MC question earlier (PT 126/S1/Q18 if you're curious), and I am realizing that I struggle knowing how to differentiate the context from the conclusion. Sometimes, typically on easier questions, it is obvious to me, but on harder ones like this, it is hard for me to understand it. I am fairly good at differentiating support from the conclusion, but the context throws me off since it is sometimes used as a reference rather than as support.
Does anyone have any tips? Thanks!
When I PT, I listen to the same two songs in the background (Isimo and MCPDC by the Bleachers, if you're curious), but I also typically end up pausing it for long stretches and do my best to operate with just natural background noise. I plan on going to the library a lot in July when I PT to mimic the environment better, though.
Take some gap years. If law school is still your passion, give another crack at the LSAT then.
I totally get it. I'm not transferring bc I don't feel like fixing my data this far in, but yeah, I understand. Though I will say I think 7sage still has the cheapest waiver option. I know some other sites are still a higher amount a month
No, you should still be good!
I'd assume it would be for question type, flaw types, and conditional indicators. I didn't do flashcards but made giant notecards for question and flaw types, then I have a "cheat sheet" of conditional indicators.
That's fine, I guess, but I've had this happen on other various lessons too where that doesn't apply.
exact same thing happened to me, i didn't even read all of E. whoops
#feedback it would be nice if the thumbnails for the videos were not on screengrabs that show certain answers being x'd out. I get some of the wrong answers spoiled before I even have the chance to try it myself.
#feedback it is really difficult to see how well the sequential approach is working for me when the same passage(s) are used. I already remember the answers
On the real test, we can see the passage while going through answers still, right? So there isn't much time harm in clicking through a question to see if it applies?
#feedback would really appreciate if the correct answers were also given for proper contrast
My timing needs work, but only missed 2 on hard
For law school applications (and future bar admission), how should I go about what jobs I include? I started working at 17, and my first job I was at for really around 4 years, but I quit a couple times and came back, always on good terms and it was a normal thing at that job. There were some jobs after age 18 where I was at for one day, a couple of weeks, or just one week before realizing it wouldn't be a good fit, and I'd find other options. All retail and service jobs, and these short jobs were always outweighed by other jobs that were great experiences. I would just hate to get through law school only to get struck down by the bar for a resume issue.
Who does the LSAC consider a "qualified professional"? I have a licensed professional counselor who, in the state I am in, is licensed to diagnose and treat, and her "expertise" is within my diagnoses. I'm getting ready to get everything together for accommodations, but I am so confused what they would consider.
Just commenting to celebrate i got every question right for this passage. Maybe it was because it was only level 3 reading difficulty, maybe it was because I love humanities. But a win is a win
13/14 then 14/14 but my timing is so off.
Isn't C also wrong because it specifies animals but the law was only about one animal? It would lose accuracy points.
Obviously barring that E was not the answer it is, could D have merit if this was an inference question? idk what's wrong with me that i totally looked past E
What the flip was this, and is the curve forgiving on these questions... :( I kinda wish it was a You Try so that I could've had more ease with referring back to the passage.
When I first looked at A, I was confused because I didn't understand how airtime equated to understanding access. I read it as access to TV rather than generic access to imported. Because of this misreading, I opted for E even though I wasn't confident with it (but understood it more than A).
With that, does anyone know if this one has the same content as the new one, or am I missing out on content?
The second passage I had was absolutely monstrous.
Nice AI work lmao