User Avatar
chantilas
Joined
Sep 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
164
CAS GPA
3.68
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Berkeley
In process
Colorado - Boulder
In process
Columbia
In process
Cornell
In process
CUNY
In process
Duke
In process
Georgetown
In process
George Washington
In process
Michigan
In process
NYU
In process
UC - Davis
In process
UCLA
In process
UNC
In process
UPenn
In process
UT Austin
In process
Wake Forest
In process

Discussions

User Avatar

Thursday, Jul 30

chantilas

🙃 Confused

Inconsistency a Couple weeks out

I’ve been studying for the last year or so. My diagnostic was 164. A week ago, I logged a 171 and was psyched. But I took another practice test this week and got a 163. I tend to find in my practice sections that I have two modes: either I get a -0 to -3 OR I go like -5. Has anyone encountered this sort of swinging inconsistency? It’s frustrating and I’m not sure how to fix it more consistently. The annoying thing is that in the last two PTs I mentioned above (171 & 163), both of my scores were 178 & 179 respectively. I’m scratching my head and supposed to take the real thing next week. Any advice or encouraging stories would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!

2
User Avatar
chantilas
Thursday, Dec 11, 2025

@bichimichi I thought so too and it annoyed me a lot, but actually it will recommend you blind review any that you take a very long time on, or change your answer to multiple times, or answer so quickly that it seems like a guess. To tell why they're recommending you blind review, you should hover your mouse over the little information (i) symbol next to "blind review" and it will tell you why it is recommending that you review it. Hope this helps.

1
User Avatar
chantilas
Friday, Oct 24, 2025

why is the negation for question four not: some large animals can move more rapidly than small animals. That feels like it follows from "it's not the case that small animals can move more rapidly than large animals".

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?