Wow, 3 years is a long haul, congrats on hanging in there!

Quite an overlooked observation you made in regards to people that appear to just blitz the test cold. I have never played video games, but I definitely got lulled into rote learning and being spoon fed throughout high school, so the demands of the LSAT have been a massive reality check, and I've had to give myself more time to adjust as a result.

Congrats again! :)

I have been stuck on the same idea, but I think the "more frequently" tacked on at the end of the new airplanes suggests that verbal communication is still needed somewhat for older airplanes. Still not 100% comfortable with this tho tbh

When you say A is 'too strong' what exact flaw would you ascribe to it? Is (A) wrong both because it confuses a relative with an absolute statement and also, because "any work of art" is too strong, aka, it fails to consider the myriad of overriding factors that could deem other amateur works of art more favourable than the one painting shown in the passage?

I don't know if you are around, but I see your comments here a lot and I find them very insightful, thanks!

Not an expert here, but note that the stimulus doesn't utilize our familiar logical indicators so I don't believe we should be inclined to use write any conditional statements beyond the initial statement (Great Economic Prosperity→Latest Electronic Technology).

From here, the following statements are just assumed features of technologically advanced countries, rather than dependent on some form of conditionality. That's how I interpreted it anyway...

@fincobb497 I get where you are coming from, but I know Mike Kim will advise that you read for structure, not detail, which I feel is a completely different approach from the low & high res we've been brought up to do through 7sage. I may be misinterpreting this, but would be interested to know what you think. I certainly have not mastered RC yet.

Tried to answer this one intuitively and didn't find the conditional chain useful tbh. Should I be working towards making an elaborate conditional chain during the exam or to answering these questions intuitively?

#help (Added by Admin)

Good call, re: AC (A). I eliminated it bc I read "grounds for making exceptions in the application of the laws", as carving out exceptions to what would be considered standard applications of the laws

Yes, I was looking for this... I figured this out intuitively but was wondering whether the logic applied?

I thought (E) was picking up on the difference between people's at home diets vs when they go out to eat; implying that they are still eating a similar amount of steak out, but are eating less at home, hence satisfying the health advice. I didn't think it was drawing a distinction between steak consumers and non-steak consumers, but I may be misreading your comment.

I don't know why, but I seem to not be cottoning on to why (A) is irrelevant. I see why it is not a criticism of the argument, but does it not strengthen the argument by saying that productivity would not just stay at the normal rate (for 990W), but could actually see an increase as a result of the per capita increase?

@patra5cg713 thanks I appreciate the advice. The Trainer certainly in providing a clearer picture of each question type. If and when would you suggest drilling particular question types? I know it's a bit off topic, but I've read the other discussions on it and most people don't suggest using the question bank to quiz untaken questions as it is a waste of future PTs, but then I fall into the pitfall of doing questions I already have a recollection of. Anyway, thanks a lot :)

@mirivas61 Thanks for taking the time to comment. I have done a few individual timed sections with the 10 actuals (I have 72-81 currently), just to see how I would feel being able to review it all in one day. However, I was mainly using the LSAT Hack to review them, which sort of defeats the purpose of being on 7sage. Were you more alluding to isolating specific sections within 7sage?

I will try and review the LR questions by type, rather than as they appear on the test, it will probably be easier to identify patterns in my approach, I don't know why I didn't think of that lol, thanks!

@andywsoccer421 thanks for the recommendation, perhaps a more thorough BR would help. I only take up to 2 hours per section to review per section, (that is, watch the video and take notes after BR). How often were you doing PTs after you finished the CC?

damn! Still being punished for not paying attention in 10th grade physics class!

So, is the distinction between what occurred and what was actually codified as a standard?

i.e, prior to 1700 buildings were driven to 'refusal' however the 'standard of refusal' was the subject's bridge (when additional penetration was less than 2 inches per 24 hammer blows).

Sorry, I have read all the comments and I am still frustratingly trying to clarify this distinction.

I got the apology as well - It seems as though they won't use the flex option for international exams, but with that being said, will international exams go ahead at all?

Where are you sitting the exam out of curiosity?

I can relate to JY's dilemma here of not being clear enough of the stimulus and hence not picking up on the flight/plane distinction, however, how do you reconcile this patience with time constraints?

#help (Added by Admin)

54 if you count the 2 jokers

Same. Language very vague in the stimulus, I think this is a poor question.

I misinterpreted that E is referring to an even newer lightbulb than 'these new bulbs', which is referred to in the stimulus. Why couldn't they refer to it as singular..