User Avatar
cprice4837
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
•

Tuesday, Dec 21, 2021

cprice4837

Personal Statement Multiple events

I have an idea for a personal statement structure. I want to introduce 3 events that all taught me the importance of a single virtue. Would it be a bad move to have 3 paragraphs talking on 3 different events?

0
PrepTests ·
PT153.S1.P4.Q27
User Avatar
cprice4837
Friday, Dec 17, 2021

Is this the recommended method for tackling all RC passages with Passage A and Passage B organization? Read passage A, eliminate answers then read passage B and finalize answers

0
User Avatar
•

Tuesday, Dec 14, 2021

cprice4837

Best method for Preptests

I have found that the foolproof method for logic games is very very effective. Is there something similar for PTs? I am taking one a week and pretty much just drilling the questions all over the place.

Is there a more methodical way someone has found that is effective?

1
PrepTests ·
PT153.S1.P1.Q1
User Avatar
cprice4837
Thursday, Dec 9, 2021

What should we do for online LSAT taking? Is it possible to annotate next to paragraphs like this?

0
User Avatar
cprice4837
Monday, Oct 18, 2021

Absolutely interested in this. I struggle on logic games and resoning

0
PrepTests ·
PT103.S3.Q6
User Avatar
cprice4837
Monday, Sep 27, 2021

Going back to the Goku analogy, doesn't E directly attack the conclusion (the truck)?

The scientist says this consideration of bias is irrelevant, it has no place in science. Then we chose E that basically says, this bias is bad science throw it out anyway (is that even what its saying)?

In my mind it looks like E is questioning the validity of the scientists conclusion directly. Someone please explain.

4

Confirm action

Are you sure?