I have an idea for a personal statement structure. I want to introduce 3 events that all taught me the importance of a single virtue. Would it be a bad move to have 3 paragraphs talking on 3 different events?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I have found that the foolproof method for logic games is very very effective. Is there something similar for PTs? I am taking one a week and pretty much just drilling the questions all over the place.
Is there a more methodical way someone has found that is effective?
What should we do for online LSAT taking? Is it possible to annotate next to paragraphs like this?
Absolutely interested in this. I struggle on logic games and resoning
Going back to the Goku analogy, doesn't E directly attack the conclusion (the truck)?
The scientist says this consideration of bias is irrelevant, it has no place in science. Then we chose E that basically says, this bias is bad science throw it out anyway (is that even what its saying)?
In my mind it looks like E is questioning the validity of the scientists conclusion directly. Someone please explain.
Is this the recommended method for tackling all RC passages with Passage A and Passage B organization? Read passage A, eliminate answers then read passage B and finalize answers