Subscription pricing
How do you check answers after completing the blind review? I don't see where you can submit the reviewed section and receive feedback.
PT Questions
ctt737608
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
ctt737608
Wednesday, Sep 06 2023
#help the "probably" in D seems equivalent to "could" in the stimulus, no?
ctt737608
Saturday, Aug 12 2023
LR questions are sooo tricky, the most subtle things can go right over your head!!!
ctt737608
Tuesday, Aug 01 2023
ME TOO!!! this seems like the obvious assumption to draw
ctt737608
Wednesday, Jul 26 2023
I think the hardest part is figuring out the flow of the argument. which phrases are the conclusion, and which are the premises was hard to decipher.
ctt737608
Saturday, Jul 01 2023
Right, I was led to believe this as well, but none of the answer choices support that idea, forcing one to approach the question differently
ctt737608
Tuesday, Jun 27 2023
Coming in with a background in chemistry, 26 threw me off because high temperatures are high in entropy, so I crossed out C assuming the passages are factually accurate.
ctt737608
Monday, Jun 26 2023
Answer choice C made me believe there was an absolute decrease in loans to banks that aren't financially strong, given that the stimulus said banks currently don't lend to companies that aren't financially strong. (going from lending something to currently lending nothing, seems like a clear decrease in the size of loans to companies not financially strong)
ctt737608
Monday, Jun 12 2023
I interpreted subjective to be how the author described the manner in which Marshall meticulously chose cases- he was subjective with plaintiffs. But I think my error was focusing too much on the perspective of Marshall rather than the author.
ctt737608
Monday, May 22 2023
I agree, sound quality has no relation to accuracy.
ctt737608
Tuesday, Jan 31 2023
If E is correct, then lobsters must live long enough to get gill disease. However, the passage says lobsters hardly live long enough to contract it? #help
ctt737608
Tuesday, Jan 31 2023
For B, it brings into question other, unassociated languages. I thought, that for weakening an argument, you must specifically attack the one language in question, PIE. For this reason, A seemed like a more attractive answer given the direct attack on the language. If you're questioning other languages, so what? Those aren't THIS language, PIE. #help
ctt737608
Friday, Jan 27 2023
PDF nor videos, none of the content is loading.
ctt737608
Monday, Jan 16 2023
Similarly to the same reasoning the instructor provides for A, why would C be correct, based on the assumption that ANY celestial object with Li is a BD? Why can you assume any celestial object, when it could be an asteroid or satellite
#help (Added by Admin)
ctt737608
Sunday, Jan 15 2023
I thought D was correct, because it says the mint refines gold and produces coins of much purer gold content and the Senegal gold isn't refined. Therefore, I assumed that 92% was the lowest possible gold content of the coins produced, since they don't refined the Senegal gold and the other coins minted are of "much purer gold content".
ctt737608
Tuesday, Jan 10 2023
I thought the exact same thing! There was no data to prove, and the lack of data is exactly why this theory is questionable. So I incorrectly went with C, however B seems slightly untrue.
ctt737608
Tuesday, Jan 10 2023
I thought the same, and chose C. The answer choice was misleading because they are overspending in total, but regarding maintenance costs only, they should be spending 14mil more (to be like the well-run bridge program). Really tricky
ctt737608
Tuesday, Jan 10 2023
My problem was checking the answers after clicking and completing the blind review, not checking after the initial attempt.
SAME i used to always get 1-10 correct and now I keep missing the easy questions