Self-study
what am I missing
Admin Note: Edited title. For LR questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
dancharasz340
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
dancharasz340
Thursday, Apr 04 2024
I get that the word number makes c sound arbitrary but the argument criticizes the claim that "society can flourish" in anarchy merely by saying chaos or anarchy is unacceptable. I read C as saying it doesn't matter if it's acceptable for it to be true that society can flourish which makes sense?
dancharasz340
Friday, Feb 23 2024
Still dont understand how the first sentence supports the last more than the other way around. How do you instincitvely take those middle premises to support the first sentence and then the third instead of the third and then the first. The only justification I see for the last sentence being the conclusion is "So" but directionally the otherway makes more sense going from specific to vague in a sufficiency sense.
dancharasz340
Monday, Feb 19 2024
I like B as a wrong answer because you can just assume they're stupid for an explanation
dancharasz340
Sunday, Feb 18 2024
19) Doesn't the phrase "despite evidence indicating that the orchestral piano was virtually
inaudible" negate unwittingly in the correct answer D. Also I don't see whats so far off about the aesthetic and historical parts in C.
dancharasz340
Wednesday, Jan 31 2024
I think impatient is a logical negation of very patient as well.
tense definitely makes this a scam question. The general fact that something has increased over a specific period of time cannot change. Changing the timeframe does not change the fact of the period this sentence refers to.