So when you negate a "most" statement, "none" "few" "some" "many" could be true?

The LSAT has nothing to do breaking down legal cases. There could possibly be law-related material on the RC section, but in general the LSAT can have questions about any sort of topic. It is meant to test your critical reasoning and reading comprehension skills.

That is an argument with a premise and a conclusion, and I would say 'because' is still the indicator word here. The conclusion, 'the test must have been hard,' follows the indicator 'because of this.' I’m not sure if you would see 'because of this' on the LSAT, since it is not grammatically correct, but in this case, it is interchangeable with an indicator word like 'so,' which was mentioned in a previous lesson.

His example made us arrive at different conclusions. He made some people consider veganism, but I instead became hungry for a cheeseburger with a side of fries.