- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
same here. gosh. I even forgot to find the conclusion.
Thanks for this! Definitely a tip!
Was stuck between A and D. Did not choose A because I assumed "others" would be an alternative. Me thinks, "who are the others?". Chose D. Was wrong. :')
D weakens because: if the child has to go through training (that the child is related to someone with perfect pitch), then answer choice is saying that said child has no perfect pitch.
I see it now.
Was stuck between A and D. Did not choose A because I assumed "others" would be an alternative. Me thinks, "who are the others?". Chose D. Was wrong. :')
This breakdown of most strongly supported is thorough. It helped me understand how to make an inference. I got 2/5 from the exercise but I understood where I lack in understanding "reading between the lines". Thank you J.Y. and team!
Is it safe to assume that group 3 indicators introduce a necessary condition?
B. nonmamallians. duh, stimulus says nothing about them. unsupported. I cry.
Hello! Yes, I'd like to join. Please add me!
When you say "swing the comparative word", would it be necessary to find the opposite of that word or not really, or does it depends?