I'm currently registered for the June LSAT (first registration with preview), and since I'm an international, I cannot postpone to the August LSAT, as it is only for US. My PTs have been averaging around the mid 160s but I do want to aim higher. Based on what I know, the best time to apply to law schools is around October, and taking it on October means that I would be receiving my score on November. Would I be at a great disadvantage to be applying a bit later, i.e. November? Should I take the June and see how it goes and take it again on October? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
entails = requires
Q22 AC C is wrong because the general assertion does not require the two examples.
Thanks everyone for the input! It really is just time to study like a demon :)
@ said:
I asked LSAC directly. You can only take tests in your region. So if you're not in the US, you can't take US tests.
I also called them directly and they told me specifically that it "isn't allowed" to take an exam that isn't meant for internationals (i.e. change the test center to US and take it anyway even though you are geographically elsewhere) :(
@ said:
I'm in the same boat as you taking it overseas!
I'm taking it in June exactly because the next chance wouldn't be until October. While I may be more confident in my abilities by waiting til October, I think I'd be missing out on a potential chance to apply as early as possible if I don't take the June exam. If you're mid 160s and there are still a couple weeks left, with a rigorous study routine for the next couple weeks, you may pull off the score you want. Worst case, you have to take it in October again, but you've experienced the test and can maybe manage your nerves better than the first time you took it. Best case you get the score you want and can focus on the other parts of your application.
Thank you so much for your input! I guess I should focus on PTing rigorously and just take it in June and see how it goes. Very comforting to know that there are others in the same situation. Good luck to both of us on the June LSAT!
Is it wrong to assume, for answer choice C, that by "increasing the yield" for crops, it means that farmers are, after 1985, able to produce more crop even with lesser amounts of fertilizer? #help
Answer choice B: Even without direct mail advertisements, people will buy the products. Hence, the direct mail advertisements enable or give an alternative to people to instead order via online/phone.
Is this the correct way of understanding this answer choice?
PTing around 167~173 as well. I'm willing to join this group! Let's do this!
Is there no explanation for question 27? #help
I thought E was wrong initially because I assumed the argument wasn't about caloric expenditure, but caloric intake as the stimulus supplies. But I guess a high caloric diet means the net caloric gain?
I wish the explanations were more straight to the POINT