Self-study
I am wondering if it is possible to filter out the questions that I've done wrong from the question bank.
dh487768
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
dh487768
Tuesday, Sep 15, 2020
I am confused .....
is “keeping bees is economical" the same as "keeping bees" ?
#help (Added by Admin)
dh487768
Thursday, Aug 20, 2020
#help
I am confused here. In, Passage B Paragraph 2, isn't Newton's law a "auxiliary assumption"? An example of "other theories" mentioned in line 24 ?
dh487768
Tuesday, Apr 21, 2020
I had a lot of trouble understanding what "free installation" means......
Didn't expect it to mean some one will install it for you for free...
dh487768
Wednesday, Apr 8, 2020
#help I am still confused on why A is incorrect for problem 9.
I get that it says "paragraphs" which is a very subtle point. Anything besides this?
dh487768
Wednesday, Apr 8, 2020
I thought both the stim and E are flawed because they both assumed the "limit" only has an upper limit and not a lower one.
For example, to be within the "cost limit" the cost should be below a certain bar and also above a certain bar. i.e if the "cost limit" is $1000 do $5000, and QI costs 2000. QI is within the limit. If Corelink costs 800, which is still lower than QI, it doesn't necessary meet the limit.
Same for the "low fat" standard. A "low fat standard" is probably 1% to 2% fat. If a cheese is below 1%, then it will be categorized in to "non-fat" cheese, rather than "low fat".
So the thing here is that both stim and E are assuming there's no lower limit.
dh487768
Thursday, Mar 26, 2020
#help
How do you translate this sentence into lawgic?
"Maximum utility is assured only in a pure free market economy"
only is a group 2 lawgic indicator, which indicates necessary assumption.
so is it Maximum utility → Pure free market economy?
but the word "assured" makes me think that Maximum Utility is a necessary condition for pure free market economy.
then it should be Pure free market economy → Maximum utility?
Can someone please help？
dh487768
Sunday, Feb 23, 2020
When I first read the stimulus, I thought the problem is that "punishment" doesn't equal "punishment for crimes".
dh487768
Thursday, Feb 13, 2020
The correct answer is A which says " we will never know whether the end-of-history theory is true". But in this case, we would know that this theory is not true.
I chose A anyways because the rest of the answers are clearly wrong.
dh487768
Thursday, Feb 13, 2020
#help
But if one day in our life time, the Communism ideals triumphed over the democratic ideals, then won't we know that "the end of history" theory is wrong?
dh487768
Wednesday, Feb 12, 2020
Suppose the first censor received x manuscripts and second censor received y manuscripts
The first censor didn't approve 50%, then he/she approved 50% of the manuscripts. So the number of manuscripts approved by the first censor is 0.5x.
The second censor didn't approve 25%, then he/she approved 75% of the manuscripts. So the number of manuscripts approved by the second censor is 0.75y.
Then we have the equation 0.5x = 0.75y, which gives us x/y = 0.75/0.5 > 1. So there are more x then y, meaning the first censor received more manuscripts then the second censor did.
The premise given to the causal link is that the houses with AC and without high ceiling and thick walls generally sold well. Even if E is true, we don't know whether the houses with the new thermal - insulating sold well. If they don't sell well, why would changes be attributed to new-thermal-insulating tech.