Subscription pricing
I am wondering if it is possible to filter out the questions that I've done wrong from the question bank.
PT Questions
dh487768
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
dh487768
Tuesday, Apr 21 2020
I had a lot of trouble understanding what "free installation" means......
Didn't expect it to mean some one will install it for you for free...
dh487768
Thursday, Aug 20 2020
#help
I am confused here. In, Passage B Paragraph 2, isn't Newton's law a "auxiliary assumption"? An example of "other theories" mentioned in line 24 ?
dh487768
Tuesday, Feb 18 2020
Did see the "LEAST" and got extremely confused
dh487768
Tuesday, Sep 15 2020
I am confused .....
is “keeping bees is economical" the same as "keeping bees" ?
#help (Added by Admin)
dh487768
Wednesday, Feb 12 2020
Suppose the first censor received x manuscripts and second censor received y manuscripts
The first censor didn't approve 50%, then he/she approved 50% of the manuscripts. So the number of manuscripts approved by the first censor is 0.5x.
The second censor didn't approve 25%, then he/she approved 75% of the manuscripts. So the number of manuscripts approved by the second censor is 0.75y.
Then we have the equation 0.5x = 0.75y, which gives us x/y = 0.75/0.5 > 1. So there are more x then y, meaning the first censor received more manuscripts then the second censor did.
dh487768
Saturday, Apr 11 2020
#help Are cosmic dust and cosmic debris the same thing?
dh487768
Wednesday, Apr 08 2020
#help I am still confused on why A is incorrect for problem 9.
I get that it says "paragraphs" which is a very subtle point. Anything besides this?
dh487768
Wednesday, Apr 08 2020
I thought both the stim and E are flawed because they both assumed the "limit" only has an upper limit and not a lower one.
For example, to be within the "cost limit" the cost should be below a certain bar and also above a certain bar. i.e if the "cost limit" is $1000 do $5000, and QI costs 2000. QI is within the limit. If Corelink costs 800, which is still lower than QI, it doesn't necessary meet the limit.
Same for the "low fat" standard. A "low fat standard" is probably 1% to 2% fat. If a cheese is below 1%, then it will be categorized in to "non-fat" cheese, rather than "low fat".
So the thing here is that both stim and E are assuming there's no lower limit.
#help
How do you translate this sentence into lawgic?
"Maximum utility is assured only in a pure free market economy"
only is a group 2 lawgic indicator, which indicates necessary assumption.
so is it Maximum utility → Pure free market economy?
but the word "assured" makes me think that Maximum Utility is a necessary condition for pure free market economy.
then it should be Pure free market economy → Maximum utility?
Can someone please help？