Self-study
Hello all,
I am wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction to how to sign up for the August LSAT test. I am also wondering how/when to apply for extra time on the August LSAT test.
Best,
Drew
PT Questions
drewfavakeh624
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
drewfavakeh624
Friday, Aug 16 2024
Can someone help explain why (A) is the correct answer when it contains "should" (prescriptive)? I don't see how the passage is prescriptive, but I must be missing something.
drewfavakeh624
Thursday, Aug 15 2024
I think I figured it out. "The only" is different from "only." The former falls under conditional 1 indicators, not conditional 2 indicators, though perhaps I am misunderstanding.
drewfavakeh624
Friday, Aug 09 2024
Question 3 states, "In tall palms, the terminal bud on the main stem is the only one to develop." I was correct to say that "If bud develops -> Then it is the terminal bud on the main stem."
However, the rule of the Conditional 2 Group Indicators, states that "the idea immediately follow the logical indicator is the necessary condition." One of the Conditional 2 Group Indicators is "Only." Following this logic, I found that "one to develop" would be the necessary condition. But in this sentence, "develop" falls on the left side of the arrow, not on the right.
#help #feedback
drewfavakeh624
Wednesday, Aug 07 2024
I'm a little confused because group 2 conditional indicators include "only, only if, only when, only where, always, must," while the 7.1-7.5, which include "If." Wouldn't that trigger the sufficient condition (Group 1), rather than the necessary conditions (Group 2)?
For example, "If the use of antibiotics is excessive in a community, then there are substantially more drug-resistant bacteria."
drewfavakeh624
Thursday, Jun 06 2024
I would also join.
drewfavakeh624
Sunday, May 12 2024
Can't you separate this sentence "Harry or Ron will enroll in Professor Flitwick's Charms Class," into two separate sentences.
"Harry might enroll in Professor Flitwick's Charms Class."
"Ron might enroll in Professor Flitwick's Charms Class."
Or does that not work?
#help #feedback
drewfavakeh624
Saturday, Apr 20 2024
For question 2.1, can one argue that there is a sub-conclusion present? I understood that "But this is not a sustainable, long-term solution," was the main conclusion, but couldn't the fact that the unpleasant odors could "lead to hygiene issues," be a sub-conclusion as well?
drewfavakeh624
Saturday, Apr 20 2024
For question 2.1, why is this part labeled as a premise instead of background?: "Tax on sugar-laden foods is now implemented at a level such that it costs a company more to pay the tax than it would have cost to create healthier options."
drewfavakeh624
Thursday, Apr 11 2024
For question 8, I found that Einstein understood Newtonian mechanics to be inaccurate. But could Einstein have also been able to explore space? This sentence in the premise leads me to believe so: "Space exploration necessitates an understanding of general relativity."
But then again, I could also see that sentence not being pertinent to our main conclusion.
drewfavakeh624
Monday, Apr 08 2024
As you can see from the comments above, Jack isn't the only one to have experienced this. This comment was from two months ago. Is there an update on whether 7Sage will attach explanatory videos to its lessons?
drewfavakeh624
Saturday, Apr 06 2024
#help I am also wondering the same thing.
drewfavakeh624
Sunday, Mar 24 2024
Would the contrapositive for "If one does not live in the United States, then one does not live in New York City" be "You must live in the United States to live in New York City"?
I was very close to choosing (A) for this exact same reason. I saw "damage...over time," and inferred that, then, younger whales would then be "better able to tolerate" engine noise, than older whales.
I believe the tutor says no damage does not equal "better able to tolerate," but I thought, for a split second, that those could be equivalent.
I do wonder if there is another reason that (A) is incorrect, aside from no damage not being equivalent to "better able to tolerate."