I had this exact same thought-process –– my immediate flaw paraphrase was to be wary of a self-reporting. But then I thought "flight reports required by pilots" was too ambiguous & LSAT would be more explicit if it was actual self-reporting.
If anything, I thought it would be reasonable to assume the standard was that DON'T self-report precisely because of misreporting concerns.
I also had this exact thought process, referencing lines 30-33:"....visually disintegrates into panels of lacquered bricks on the screen."
However, I think the passage is using "bricks" as a visual descriptor of the screen panel design, not as a reference to the actual material used.
Lines 9 tell us, "...the Japanese tradition of lacquer...employing wood surfaces for the application of the clear, hard-drying liquid."
Line 20, the same paragraph referencing the lacquered bricks, says: "...the wood used in lacquer work lacquered on both sides to prevent warping" –– the paragraph then goes on to discuss how Gray's use of lacquer evolved from flat panels to more functional, 3D objects.
#Help
How does one translate this in conditional logic:
"If one has X, everyone must do Y, if they are to achieve X"
Example: "If one has defined a goal, everyone must work together, if they are to achieve that goal"
Is it two seperate conditionals: defined goal > work together & achieve goal > work together
Or is it: achieve goal > (defined goal > work together)
I made this same mistake! I don't think the assumption that people switching from community gardens to personal gardens is unwarranted, but this doesn't account for the 19% increase in seed company sales. You can rent a community garden plot and still have to purchase seeds, which could explain the increased seed sales. So this AC doesn't fully account for the phenomenon.
Tuesday tester. I had RC - LR - LR - LG.
RC -- nigerian languages, ansel adams aperture, reduced sentences & prosecutorial misconduct, quantaum physicics comparative. The last passage was tricky given how abstract the concepts where, but the questions themselves were a bit easier from a POE perspective.
LR 1 -- group memberships & political influence; rigged election; using paper materials vs. digital materials & reducing global pollution. Thought certain questions were tricky & came down to 2 ACs, but not too brutal overall.
LR 2 -- First ~10 questions had more assumption family questions than I expected for so early in the section. Roast chicken vs. fresh chicken; copyright protections; monkey tokens (this one got me); revolutionary political movements