Self-study
Is there any way to delete all my 7sage history to start all over again? Drills, sections, PTs. Is there any way of doing this? I would like to through everything again
PT Questions
elbicho
- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Live
elbicho
Tuesday, Nov 04 2025
the reason why B is wrong is because the argument never assumes that ANY (as in whichever failure of the system) will make the air bag to inflate. For example, for B to be true, the author would have to assume that maybe an issue that only affects the computer like for example malware that plays an infinite loop of taylor swift's new album will trigger the airbag. This is why B is wrong.
elbicho
Edited Tuesday, Nov 04 2025
the only reason i got this wrong was because i did not read the stimulus. i thought the stim described the case of a man going into a local store, i did not read that is was the store. i literally stopped reading the stim at "i talk to people at a local store and they tell me they are not worried about crime in this neighborhood." actually i think i only read this part and concluded c. i should have read
elbicho
Tuesday, Nov 04 2025
you know what, i initally doubted e because i thought an ac this simple could not have possible been written. it felt like cheese for a mouse. wasted a good minute in this question reassesing what i know from the stim. damn.
elbicho
Edited Tuesday, Nov 04 2025
lmao this question made me laugh i wasnt expecting the paracetamol in the bloodstream claim
elbicho
Edited Monday, Nov 03 2025
@caitlinmattar983 You can do this with A and E only, not with C. And yes this is completely valid, in fact, if you go to LawHub they have a whole video where an individual tells you to scratch based on this precise reason. C is not wrong for the reason you describe though c contains a positive outcome in one of its conditions
elbicho
Friday, Oct 31 2025
heres how i thought about it:
the stim describes a negation of a fact based on evidence that would suggest the opposite (as in things are increasing), so theres no reason to deny, but even then it denies.
a is wrong because its about a belief rather than something factual
b is perfect: b describes an effect, gives evidence suggesting its actually happening, but then denies.
c, d, and e are all wrong they do not even deserve being read because all of them discuss positive agreements. automatically wrong.
b is perfect its the only that denies something happening based on evidence that suggests its happening.
elbicho
Friday, Oct 31 2025
@vayne_top_main ewwww vayne top (im a lulu top main).
elbicho
Friday, Oct 31 2025
so guys instead of using conditionals for these types of questions you can do this since im seeing a lot of people trip by using conditional malarkey that does not work.
First, identify what is the reasoning in the stim. In this scenario, the reasoning is this:
two options are presented, there is an issue with one, so we must chose the other.
Second, pick the one that matches, in this case B.
Then voila, B is the only that matches. Do this, do not waste time drawing its so stupid. This should take like 30 seconds doing conditional malarkey is gonna destroy your tempo.
elbicho
Friday, Oct 31 2025
@ksh9665264 No. It would still be wrong because it is a restate of a premise and it still does not bridge the gap necessary to explain why he must skip the step. Only E is valid
elbicho
Friday, Oct 31 2025
There is no shot this is a level 5 question. I do not understand why high scorers are having issues with B. The conclusion is about sand removal. We do not care about other contaminants. Why is this answer so sought after?
elbicho
Tuesday, Oct 28 2025
@LSATcricket YUP! This is precisely the reasoning as to why its D! No need for conditionals Sir. Great job
elbicho
Tuesday, Oct 28 2025
@Zanderantochow hell no. there is absolutely no need to do that lmao and you will lose time if you do draw this. there is absolutely no reason to draw unless the arguments require heavy conditionals that are not built to be reasoned. look.
a is wrong because the stim says that they can achieve it not that they will. it is not guaranteed.
b is wrong because because we do not know this from the stim and it could be false. for example maybe youre not a lit professor but you did your specialized training anyway.
c is wrong because the stim is not about what should or should not happen.
d is wrong because they do belong to the reading public. they read. could be false.
e is perfect. we know that the vast public has no specialized training so they can not have an ability to judge the greatness of a literary work since that can be obtained only after years of training.
easy peasy. no need to draw the mona lisa.
elbicho
Tuesday, Oct 28 2025
@jwperumal467 no. b is also wrong precisely for the reason you listed. b talks about a trigger concerning risk. that does not matter. the support used to justify the conclusion is that of deliberetly stopping a life without bringing it back. d is thus the principle.
elbicho
Tuesday, Oct 28 2025
no need for conditional malarkey here. b is wrong because it talks about carrying high risk. this is not a trigger that is relevant for the support premise used that we need to bridge to justify the conclusion. the conclusion explicitly says "does not resume following the procedure." does not talk about risk.
relying to much on conditionals is hurting all of you.
elbicho
Monday, Oct 27 2025
bruh i thought this was a disagree and i picked C lmao
elbicho
Monday, Oct 27 2025
Literally could not understand the wording of c. im so fucking tired of this test
elbicho
Sunday, Oct 26 2025
i scratched a because i figured the answer could not be that simple. yikes.
elbicho
Sunday, Oct 26 2025
A, B, and C are popular wrong ac's and I will try my best to explain why theyre wrong.
A: This is a sufficiency necessity confussion. Check the suport under the conclusion. This sentence says aesthetic value (sufficient) cannot be discussed unless two eaders agree on correct interpretation (necessity) A flips them around.
B: Ensures goes beyond the logical strenght of the stim since the stim says "evaluation is possible if" but never talks about ensuring objective evaluation.
C: This one is just plain out of scope because the conclusion is about objective evalutation but c talks aobut discussion. This is out of scope.
E: This one is just completely unrelated to the conclusion we are trying to hold since it talks about how evaluation is best conducted rather than achieving evaluation.
elbicho
Sunday, Oct 26 2025
@alannaliu2025879 ill try to explain simple without conditional mapping
so b says that it ensures proper evaluation but the stim never says this. the stim says it allows for the possibiliy but never says it will ensure it.
c: c is just ouf of scope because the conclusion is not aobut discussion its about evalutation. so c is automatically wrong
b is wrong because it would could be referring to a totally different conversation. we are trying to justify why milk can lower blood pressure not that it does not contribute to it.
similarly, the same can be said about c. yes, its good milk does not raise blood pressure but thats not what matters. we need a reason as to why drink milk. c is neutral, we need something showing why milk can help combat. c is no different than suggesting we should drink water or wine.
a is therefore perfect. it gives a reason as to why milk has to be consumed and why its suggested in the conclusion: vitamin D, it contains vitamin D in enough quantities to perhaps offset deficiency
Remember guys, this stim is about why something must be consumed. Not about not raising something.
In this case, just because something does not hurt does not mean it helps, and this is why b and c are wrong and a is right.