Hi this might sound like a really stupid question but im lowkey struggling. I got to the "kick it up" lesson and was hopelessly lost so I went back to review everything beforehand and I think I'm just lacking solidity on the difference between a necesary conditon and the sufficient condition.
For example 2: If N or O is not adopted then M cannot be adopted.
It's saying that the disjunction is in the sufficient conidition so that means that N or O not being adopted is the sufficient condition. Couldn't you just as easily flip it and say that If M was not adopted then that means that either N or O were also not adopted? If so that does that change the sufficient condition to being M not being adopted? Or would it stay as N or O?
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Hi this might sound like a really stupid question but im lowkey struggling. I got to the "kick it up" lesson and was hopelessly lost so I went back to review everything beforehand and I think I'm just lacking solidity on the difference between a necesary conditon and the sufficient condition.
For example 2: If N or O is not adopted then M cannot be adopted.
It's saying that the disjunction is in the sufficient conidition so that means that N or O not being adopted is the sufficient condition. Couldn't you just as easily flip it and say that If M was not adopted then that means that either N or O were also not adopted? If so that does that change the sufficient condition to being M not being adopted? Or would it stay as N or O?