wow i did what he mentioned last lesson to skip the rest of the choices if i feel confident and i finished 45 sec ahead :) ty JY
I came into this looking to be utterly surprised by how AC A is justified because I picked AC D on a drill and then AC B on a BR. AC D was easily disproven by my own justification during BR. After seeing the justification for AC A, I was annoyed because it clearly is not good. But after seeing the video on AC B, I completely understand why AC A is the BEST answer, even though it isn't necessarily good. I hope the LSAT does not have garbage questions like this very often because this sucked.
I wrote down the assumption I located (that the lead paint in the only cause of childhood lead poisoning in the area), but I confused tantamount with paramount. I now see that tantamount means equivalent, so C would've obviously been the answer. How to improve on LSAT vocab?
I understand the point of knowing logic, but I have already taken a formal logic class. Now that LG is not included and it is only LR, should I rather focus on the modules for each type of LR question, rather than logic as a whole?
Is it an intermediate conclusion? It seems like the two sentences following the argument part in question support that argument part, making the two sentences premises that support the intermediate conclusion that supports the main conclusion.