I suggest drilling one type of question at a time, so you can start ranking your weaknesses

4 yrs later I made the same mistake ajsjshkadhskjd

just why

I am applying to Osgoode and UofT, currently studying for Jan LSAT, feel free to contact with me so we can study together!!

I think it depends on your preference. I would personally put it into the setup of the game, and when I review rules, I include the master game board as well.

same

same :/

I guess compared to C, D doesn't directly imply that they used flints for chores including aesthetic purposes. But C says "display" which gives us more clue that it might be for aesthetic purposes. :)))))))))))))

same.

Missed "SIGNIFICANTLY"and got punished for that :\\\

But consuming more calcium doesn't cause brittle bones. If caffeine makes you lose calcium, and you consume calcium-filled drinks, the calcium level in your body is probably balanced--> no brittle bones.

I guess just because it happened before his birth, doesn't mean that it's a valid reason as to why he can't paint it and include himself in it.

thank u

Hi there,

This argument is based on an assumption that there are no durable items in the pit. Cuz then why wouldn't we find anything valuable in the pit that provides us with insights?

What B does here is to eliminate the option that there could be durable items in the pit by saying that scavengers came and took them).

This strengthens the argument by maintaining the assumption.

oh god, this one is tough, did not realize that this is argument by analogy at all when I first read it.