Are their any more premise or conclusion indicator(s) words that have been found that we can add to the list?
And even words indicating a switch in the argument?
@ I had my cousin - IT spec. - access it remotely and fix a few screw-ups the Microsoft team left behind.
Thanks for the responses. It's working now.
Thanks guys. I appreciate the info.
I have them but I am looking for more. Thanks though! :)
Are their any more premise or conclusion indicator(s) words that have been found that we can add to the list?
And even words indicating a switch in the argument?
@ I've been dealing with Microsoft for several hours now; giving them administrative control over my laptop and the issue is still only with the videos on 7Sage. YouTube and other sites work well and with no issues.
What type of laptop are you using? I'm on a HP Pavilion g series (7) and I've tried just about every driver configuration and Internet setting. I emptied my browsers history, cookies and everything. I removed the browsers Chrome and Firefox and downloaded them again - same issues. I've tried Explorer and Edge - same issues. Java too - same issues.
What browser are you using and can you give me a rundown of your Internet and Driver settings and perimeters?
And did you download Win10 or was it already installed? Almost everyone on the Microsoft community claims Win10 has ruined their computers.
Hey, Sagers.
Is anyone else using Windows 10 OS and having buffering problems?
Did you have any and then solved them, how so?
It's possible to manage, IMO. Take night courses which aren't as many compared to a regular schedule, and use the accommodations office for disabilities.
I am a quadriplegic and don't let anything get me down. Also, you can always do UG Online.
I don't like this question. B seems like the correct answer. Considering "each" student selected the painting from the museum, I don't understand how that accounts for a "some" statement. Each would imply all would it not?
This is what I inferred:
P1) AP->CQ
P2) MR->BC
--------------------| C) ANSWER: AP->BQ()CQ->AP
C) NOT(AP->MR)
I guess it's just that if standard lawgic doesn't work, I adapt my own bit of reasoning and that works.
I've been doing quite well on hard SA by my method.
Go to your syllabus: Intro to Arguments - Advanced: Context v. Arg Ind.