I don't understand either still. The author says "reporting narrative events as if they were a part of". When I read "a part of" it made me think that detached couldn't be the answer.

I get almost every RC question wrong and I spend about 3 hours a day trying to understand it. Does anyone have any helpful tips on how to tackle these questions? Starting to feel like I can't do this.

I still don't understand how C isn't an assumption. Saying something will probably do something is an assumption. Can someone help?

It's the same for me. I just have to remember, with learning anything it takes time. Take the time to understand, and as you start to recognize patterns in incorrect answers, finding the correct answer will get faster. Some people increase their speed quickly and others it may take a while, but that's ok!

Can someone help explain? For weaken questions, are we looking for an answer that takes power away from the premise? Or are we looking for an answer that would refute the conclusion? Sometimes he does these long breakdowns that feel really difficult to fully understand. Any simple tricks or advice people have found helpful would be great.