Can someone help explain? For weaken questions, are we looking for an answer that takes power away from the premise? Or are we looking for an answer that would refute the conclusion? Sometimes he does these long breakdowns that feel really difficult to fully understand. Any simple tricks or advice people have found helpful would be great.

I don't understand either still. The author says "reporting narrative events as if they were a part of". When I read "a part of" it made me think that detached couldn't be the answer.

I get almost every RC question wrong and I spend about 3 hours a day trying to understand it. Does anyone have any helpful tips on how to tackle these questions? Starting to feel like I can't do this.