I was struggling between B and C becuase I knew she adopted the narritives but wasnt sure if she used them in the mythical sense as the LC did, it took me a min and a half to rly confrim my answer by going back in the text even tho I selected C in under a minute, on test day Im assuming that wont be a smart idea and to just go with my gut and move on?
I chose D because in the final paragraph a comparison is made between the New Women and the Local Colorists: "instead of the crisply plotted short stories that had been the primary genre of the local colorists, the New Women writers experimented with impressionistic methods." Since we know Chopin borrowed the conventions of the LC, I assumed strong plotlines would have been one of those conventions if strong plotlines were their primary genre
argh i got it right at first and then during my blind review the word "other" tripped me up, i assumed that "other" referred to the new women (as in other = not the local colorists) >={
I don't understand either still. The author says "reporting narrative events as if they were a part of". When I read "a part of" it made me think that detached couldn't be the answer.
I guessed and got it right. I'm still not understanding even after the video explanation.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
15 comments
idk why this was so hard for me
I succumbed to recency bias here. Didn't see any AC relating to an impressionist approach, so got stressed and guessed.
Got the question right in like 10 seconds but I got blind reviewed so I second guessed myself and BR'ed a wrong answer... whoopsie
Got this right on first instinct but took 30 seconds longer to review the passage and make sure the other answers were for sure wrong.
I was struggling between B and C becuase I knew she adopted the narritives but wasnt sure if she used them in the mythical sense as the LC did, it took me a min and a half to rly confrim my answer by going back in the text even tho I selected C in under a minute, on test day Im assuming that wont be a smart idea and to just go with my gut and move on?
I chose D because in the final paragraph a comparison is made between the New Women and the Local Colorists: "instead of the crisply plotted short stories that had been the primary genre of the local colorists, the New Women writers experimented with impressionistic methods." Since we know Chopin borrowed the conventions of the LC, I assumed strong plotlines would have been one of those conventions if strong plotlines were their primary genre
got it right but wayy too slow
argh i got it right at first and then during my blind review the word "other" tripped me up, i assumed that "other" referred to the new women (as in other = not the local colorists) >={
I don't understand either still. The author says "reporting narrative events as if they were a part of". When I read "a part of" it made me think that detached couldn't be the answer.
I am still not fully understanding what "detached narrative stance" means? #help
I guessed and got it right. I'm still not understanding even after the video explanation.