17 comments

  • Monday, Mar 16

    I have gotten every single question wrong in this section kms

    3
  • Thursday, Feb 26

    Again what

    4
  • Friday, Nov 14, 2025

    idk why this was so hard for me

    11
  • Wednesday, Oct 15, 2025

    I succumbed to recency bias here. Didn't see any AC relating to an impressionist approach, so got stressed and guessed.

    3
  • Tuesday, Aug 5, 2025

    Got the question right in like 10 seconds but I got blind reviewed so I second guessed myself and BR'ed a wrong answer... whoopsie

    5
  • Thursday, Jun 26, 2025

    Got this right on first instinct but took 30 seconds longer to review the passage and make sure the other answers were for sure wrong.

    5
  • Thursday, Jun 5, 2025

    I was struggling between B and C becuase I knew she adopted the narritives but wasnt sure if she used them in the mythical sense as the LC did, it took me a min and a half to rly confrim my answer by going back in the text even tho I selected C in under a minute, on test day Im assuming that wont be a smart idea and to just go with my gut and move on?

    0
  • Wednesday, May 14, 2025

    I chose D because in the final paragraph a comparison is made between the New Women and the Local Colorists: "instead of the crisply plotted short stories that had been the primary genre of the local colorists, the New Women writers experimented with impressionistic methods." Since we know Chopin borrowed the conventions of the LC, I assumed strong plotlines would have been one of those conventions if strong plotlines were their primary genre

    0
    Sunday, Jun 1, 2025

    So, I think strong plot lines is incorrect because it isn't explicitly stated as a convention of LC and is in many ways in opposition to the style of the New Women writers who favored impressionistic (fluid) methods.

    0
  • Thursday, Feb 13, 2025

    got it right but wayy too slow

    0
  • Thursday, Jan 9, 2025

    argh i got it right at first and then during my blind review the word "other" tripped me up, i assumed that "other" referred to the new women (as in other = not the local colorists) >={

    4
  • Wednesday, Nov 13, 2024

    I don't understand either still. The author says "reporting narrative events as if they were a part of". When I read "a part of" it made me think that detached couldn't be the answer.

    0
    Kevin_Lin Instructor
    Wednesday, Nov 13, 2024

    The "as if they were a part of" is a reference to the events. It's not saying that the LC reported events as if the LC themselves were part of the the local color. It's saying the LC reported events as if the events were part of the local color. Imagine reading a story about a murder next door to you, or an active serial killer but told in a way that just treated it like a story about the weather or a story about new fashion trends.

    0
  • Sunday, Sep 22, 2024

    I am still not fully understanding what "detached narrative stance" means? #help

    3
    Friday, Sep 27, 2024

    Same Bro. I chose B as my answer.

    0
    Kevin_Lin Instructor
    Friday, Sep 27, 2024

    We're told that the local colorists observed culture with "scientific detachment." Think about how a scientist observes things -- they're not biased or taking sides. They simply collect data and report their observations. That's the sense in which Chopin had a "detached" narrative stance. She wrote in a way that seemed to be more like just an objective report on the situation.

    7
  • Sunday, Sep 15, 2024

    I guessed and got it right. I'm still not understanding even after the video explanation.

    1

Confirm action

Are you sure?