User Avatar
fjb627658
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT104.S4.Q22
User Avatar
fjb627658
Monday, Dec 27 2021

For this one, I simply thought of me doing the action upon someone.

- I'm employing you. Check

- I'm paying you. Check

- I'm absenting you. Huh?

ACs:

- I'm honoring you. Check

- I'm appointing you. Check

- I'm nominating you. Check

- I'm transferring you. Check

- I'm escaping you. Huh? Must be correct AC

User Avatar
fjb627658
Sunday, Dec 26 2021

Agreed with poster above. Diagnostic means nothing. I scored a 141 on my diagnostic. This was a cold diagnostic. I never read an LSAT question in my life before that test. I was puzzled as to what the question even wanted me to do. On top of that, there were time constraints. I ended up not answering 31 questions. I completely guessed on others.

I just ended the core curriculum and will take my first PT within the next couple of days. I know I will see a significant improvement simply bc I now understand each question type. Furthermore, on drill sets, I notice that I often choose the same answers as those who score 162-168.

PrepTests ·
PT139.S1.Q25
User Avatar
fjb627658
Sunday, Jan 09 2022

Do you guys/gals map questions with conditional logic?

#help (Added by Admin)

User Avatar
fjb627658
Friday, Jan 07 2022

Not sure when you are submitting but I am submitting mine on February 1st (priority deadline). January LSAT scores won't post until Feb 2nd. I'm willing to bet that they wouldn't get to my application hours after I submitted it. (The school even told me that I was safe to assume that.)

Maybe it will be the case for you if you are talking about less than 3-4 days.

User Avatar
fjb627658
Monday, Jan 03 2022

@ I have the same question.

Also OP, don't be discouraged. We are about the same but I'm a little worse. My raw is around 153 (163 BR). I struggle with everything, but LG has gotten better. I believe my LR will see significant improvement because I just had an amazing "ah ha" moment where I am seeing things in a more abstract way. JY talks about it in CC. I distinguish context from the argument. I focus in on modifiers and referential phrases. I will also boil the argument down to the bare bones: Ex on a Parallel Flaw: "If A then B. C is a B. So C is a A." Any variable may represent a mouthful of words. Doing this has helped me tremendously. I used to fight against "boiling it down" because it was so foreign to me but it gets easier and faster with repetition.

I wish you all the best. I'll be satisfied if I raw a 162+. Less than two weeks to go!! We got this!

Confirm action

Are you sure?