I picked C because it is something already stated in the stimulus. Instead, I should be bridging the premise and conclusion.

#feedback #help

For question 3.1 (and the rest of that question set), is there a sub-conclusion present? See below. The sub-conclusion that the current restaurant's situation is not sustainable, long term solution is related to the main conclusion that the restaurant should stop producing food waste and shut down operations. Is that a reasonable identification to make?

Question 3.1 -

Context: The restaurants on the main block are all temporarily storing its food waste in its backyard.

Sub-conclusion: But this is not a sustainable, long term solution.

Premise: Since none of them have devised a suitable recycling or disposal plan,

Main Conclusion: they should stop producing food waste and shut down operations immediately.

Hi, same here – I live in Raleigh and would love to be a part of the group!